ConjuringCoffee
ConjuringCoffee
Ah, it seems I misunderstood, sorry. 😅 Yes, I can confirm that the link is also dead for me.
Why though? Is it because CX_ROOT has method parameters that are named exactly like attributes? If so, then that might be more sensible than defining filters on class name level...
Personally, I think `me->` only makes sense when parameters shadow attributes. Sometimes this can't be avoided. My suggestion would be to adapt check 95 to not raise an error if...
AMDP is currently out of scope, see: #108
(If this isn't the cause of the objects being deleted on Git, then I'll open a separate issue for that.)
Thanks for the input, @mbtools! I've been dealing with similar issues for quite a while now, but it only started happening with the regular ZABAPGIT logic now. That might have...
We have multiple processes in place that interact with abapGit. Let me give you a simplified overview of each of them: |Type|Description|Main purpose| | --- | --- | --- |...
I feel like this is a highly specialized / bastardized way of using abapGit, so it doesn't really make much sense to include this in the main abapGit tooling. Anyway,...
TL;DR: Rebuilding the checksums didn't seem to do anything. Objects are still falsely deleted. I'll be monitoring the behavior more closely. 3. I adjusted my logic so that after every...