Neal Gompa (ニール・ゴンパ)

@brianjmurrell Do you have a COPR project where this was built? That would also work, since they use the same Mock definitions.

The `%release` macro should never be in the changelog, nor should `%dist`.

@brianjmurrell In the case of writing out EVRs in the changelog entry, you should omit the `%dist` macro, because that value changes depending on who it is built for. So...

@sgallagher So that's a bit bizarre, because we're just getting stuff from the RPM Python bindings: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/blob/297f09e745536ef8c6944a39c9148122b7b3acd5/rpmlint/pkg.py#L647-L651

@sgallagher Hmm, I wonder, maybe this is only a problem in rpmlint-1.x? Have you tried with the current code in git master (rpmlint-2.0)?

@sgallagher That would probably help, since F32 wouldn't know `Requires(meta)`...

@sgallagher I'm pretty sure this is expected behavior... @pmatilai, @scarabeusiv, do either of you have different opinions here?

@sgallagher So the unfortunate thing is that I'm pretty sure the rpmlint policy in Fedora is kind of broken and not adhered to. This is something I'd like to fix...

I can reproduce this, but it doesn't make sense. @dmach, @j-mracek, do you have any ideas what's going on here?

Have you considered renaming the module to `obs-build` instead...? Or even `OBS::Build`?