dotnet
dotnet copied to clipboard
.NET Community Toolkit is a collection of helpers and APIs that work for all .NET developers and are agnostic of any specific UI platform. The toolkit is maintained and published by Microsoft, and par...
### Overview It's not feasible to automatically update the CanExecute status for a command when it's bound to a method. But when bound to a bool property, CanExecute should automatically...
### Describe the bug I'm using the CommunityToolkit.Mvvm version 8.2.2. Since I updated Visual Studio 2022 to the latest version 17.11.2, I keep having problems when adding new properties using...
### Describe the bug The purpose of the `ObservableObjectAttribute` is, to add Member of `ObservableObject` to a type, that itself cannot derive from `ObservableObject`. That is actually the case for...
### Describe the bug I have a wpf (core based) project, with net6.0 (with visual studio 2022 enterprise), where I installed from nuget the toolkit mvvm version 8.0.0. In the...
### Describe the bug Currently it seems that `Guard.IsReferenceEqualTo` requires the parameters to be non-null. I believe the signature should be changed to permit nullable types because I believe that...
### Describe the bug Hi, after updating the nuGet packet i get the folling error when starting the application: ```bash 2024-08-31 09:52:53.920138+0200 [54180:1568153] System.TypeLoadException: Could not set up parent class,...
### Overview The problem is explained quite clearly in #557. I believe there should be some kind of capability built into the toolkit to allow or facilitate one ObservableValidator to...
### Overview to set the parameter default value to null ````csharp Task ExecuteAsync(object? parameter); ```` to not require setting null if there is no parameters ### API breakdown ````csharp Task...
### Describe the bug When using Community Toolkit 8.4.0 with Visual Studio 17.14.4, properties that are generated using the [ObservableProperty] attribute are not detected by Visual Studio's Intellisense. This makes...
### Describe the bug Given two types, where one is derived from the other, adding a private field to the derived type with the same name as a private field...