Question about class hierarchy for change of specifically dependent continuant

[swartik]

In BFO,

realizable entity
|
+- disposition
   |
   +- function

In CCO,

Decrease of Realizable Entity
|
+- Decrease of Disposition
     |
     +- Decrease of Function

Increase of Realizable Entity
|
+- Increase of Disposition
|
+- Increase of Function

Loss of Realizable Entity
|
+- Loss of Disposition
|
+- Loss of Function

Gain of Realizable Entity
|
+- Gain of Disposition
     |
     + Gain of Function

Why is change of Function sometimes a subclass of change of Disposition and sometimes not?

[mark-jensen]

@swartik This is a mistake. Thanks for the catch. However, in the next release, most of these classes will be deprecated. During a refactoring of 'stasis' and 'change' they were found to be overly redundant. Please see here for discussion and also the branch that implements those changes.

[swartik]

@mark-jensen Thanks for letting me know. Is there a planned date for merging the stasis-change branch?

[mark-jensen]

@swartik Within the next month or two max.