daedalus

If the entry is already published then it will not override the date that has already been set. I am not opposed to introducing a setting for controlling this. What...

Interesting, I was not aware of this injection zone. I will have a look, if its allows for opting in from the configure the view I do not see why...

Awesome! It still might not be possible as i18n injects the data into the content type itself as opposed to the way I am doing it which is a seperate...

Unfortunately as the info is not actually on the schema aside from fetching it for each row in the table (which is not efficient) I do not see a way...

Thanks for the request and suggestion. For now this plugin only supports fields define don the model directly. I will at some point add relational and component support. At the...

Thanks for the report! It looks like this is due to `webhooks.populateRelations` being false in `./config/server.js`. Whether this is intentional for this setting I do not know. For now the...

I cannot reproduce this issue with the provided information. The table relation shows up in the emitted data when an event is updated. Please ensure permissions are correct for whatever...

> when merging ??? It will be fixed whenever someone has time to research and add a proper fix. The proposed one is not an ideal solution to this issue...

> Should existing SDK & GQL remain unchanged until an upcoming version when the comment field is dropped from activity? IMO SDK support can be dropped in this PR as...

> Instead of removing the /activity/comment API, should an error message similar to the one in webhooks be added? This should not be needed as in the initial release we...