Support HTTPX 0.21 leveraging RESPX

[lundberg]

This is a gentle proposal to start depending on RESPX, hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes here.

Mainly I feel that by combining the efforts of pytest_httpx and RESPX, we could ease the maintenance burden together.

The pytest_httpx API is fully kept, AFAIK, by adding the same methods to a custom HTTPXMock RESPX router .

To make the diff easier to review, I've put the new code in a separate _router.py file. Also, as can be seen, most of the new code is string manipulation to preserve identical assertion outputs for the tests.

Fixes #48

[Colin-b]

Thanks for the proposal @lundberg :) My main priority here will be to support httpx 0.20 first, and then have a look at this if that's ok ? :)

[lundberg]

My main priority here will be to support httpx 0.20 first, and then have a look at this if that's ok ? :)

Sure thing @Colin-b.

Though, this draft actually makes pytest_httpx support httpx 0.20, without changing your API 😉 .

[lundberg]

Rebased 👍

What's up with SonarCloud, seems to be complaining about your test files being too similar, i.e. duplicated code 😉 , nothing I can do about it.

[lundberg]

Bumped RESPX to support HTTPX 0.21.0.

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell

No Coverage information
13.2% Duplication

[Colin-b]

Hello @lundberg , apologies for the delay. I think those projects drifted apart and to be honest I'd rather avoid adding additional dependencies to the project. Thanks again for the proposal !