Cœur

6762 is describing performance regressions. That's what this revert is about: attempting to return to previous performances. @dantearmok am I correctly interpreting your primary issue?

In the absence of feedback from @dantearmok, I'm de-prioritizing this change. I'll instead look into the `TODO: re-implement as a callback solution`, but that may take months.

@ZipArchive/collaborators I guess none of us is actively maintaining this repo anymore, since this PR is more than 2 years old. If anyone is seeing this message and is interested...

I can see the benefit of such ordering for the stability of the created archive. However, as it has a possible performance impact, can we clarify if that sorting is...

Ah lol, right. Then I think it's good to close this pull request without merging it. I don't want to add a potentially perf-sensible step (imagine that we're zipping the...

At least, no issues at fetching the magnet and listing the files on macOS.  

And download completed without issues: 

I've added the label "scope:daemon" since it's what avatasia is reporting as being broken. I've removed "needs clarification" because avatasia says that the other clients are truncating the names. (please...

Hi @tearfur. I haven't done an actual PR, because I'm not fully grasping the issue, but based on your description would the following change be helpful? https://github.com/Coeur/swiftmission/commit/5c253a9c1c6cd501f8de95e6fc7c077a3e61ef62

Indeed, not working as is: >[21:28:06 ] /usr/bin/sandbox-exec -D SCRIPT_OUTPUT_FILE_0\=/Users/teamcity/buildAgent2/work/1f3bff43dd55cfe9/third-party/miniupnpc/miniupnpcstrings.h >[21:28:06 ] sh: updateminiupnpcstrings.sh: Operation not permitted Let me try to reference the inputs... [edit] Should be good now with...