pr-agent Extend 'similar_issue' Feature for Bitbucket Support and Update Documentation

User description

Type:

Enhancement

Description:

This PR extends the 'similar_issue' feature to support Bitbucket, in addition to the existing support for GitHub. The changes include:

Modifications to the BitbucketProvider class to handle Bitbucket-specific operations.
Updates to the GithubProvider class to handle similar operations for GitHub.
Changes to the PRSimilarIssue class to use the appropriate Git provider based on the issue URL.
Updates to the README.md file to reflect the new support for Bitbucket in the 'similar_issue' feature.

Main files walkthrough:

files:

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py: The BitbucketProvider class has been extended with methods to handle Bitbucket-specific operations. These include methods to parse issue URLs, get issues, get issue details, create comments on issues, and handle similar issues.
pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py: The GithubProvider class has been updated with similar methods to handle operations for GitHub. These include methods to get issues, create comments on issues, and handle similar issues.
pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py: The PRSimilarIssue class has been updated to use the appropriate Git provider based on the issue URL. It now supports both GitHub and Bitbucket.
README.md: The README.md file has been updated to reflect the new support for Bitbucket in the 'similar_issue' feature.

Type

Enhancement

Description

Extended BitbucketProvider with new attributes and methods for handling issues and comments on Bitbucket.
Updated GitHubProvider for consistent issue and comment handling, aligning with BitbucketProvider enhancements.
Generalized PRSimilarIssue class to support both GitHub and Bitbucket, removing the GitHub-specific restriction.
Updated README to reflect the new support for Bitbucket in the 'similar_issue' feature and marked additional support for the 'Actions' feature.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

bitbucket_provider.py `Extend BitbucketProvider for Issue Handling and Comments` pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py Added new attributes to the BitbucketProvider class for handling features, issue numbers, and issue names. Implemented methods for parsing issue URLs, getting issues, and creating comments on issues in Bitbucket. Enhanced the BitbucketProvider class to support operations specific to Bitbucket issues.	+114/-5
github_provider.py `Update GitHub Provider for Consistent Issue Handling` pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py Updated logging to use get_logger() for consistency. Added methods to handle GitHub issues similar to the new Bitbucket functionality. Enhanced GitHub provider with issue and comment handling capabilities.	+70/-2
pr_similar_issue.py `Generalize PRSimilarIssue for GitHub and Bitbucket Support` pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py Removed GitHub-specific restriction, allowing for general Git provider usage. Updated to use new methods from Git providers for issue and comment handling. Enhanced PRSimilarIssue class to support both GitHub and Bitbucket.	+21/-25

Documentation

README.md

Update README for Extended 'Find similar issue' Feature Support

README.md

Updated the README to indicate support for the 'Find similar issue'
feature on both GitHub and Bitbucket.

Marked the 'Actions' feature as supported across more platforms.

+2/-2

✨ PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

Description

Extended BitbucketProvider with new attributes and methods for handling issues and comments on Bitbucket.
Updated GitHubProvider for consistent issue and comment handling, aligning with BitbucketProvider.
Refactored PRSimilarIssue to support both GitHub and Bitbucket by using provider-specific methods.
Updated README.md to reflect the new support for Bitbucket in the similar_issue feature.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

bitbucket_provider.py `Extend BitbucketProvider with issue handling capabilities` pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py Added methods to handle Bitbucket-specific issue operations. Introduced parsing for Bitbucket issue URLs. Implemented methods to create comments and fetch issue details.	+114/-5
github_provider.py `Update GitHubProvider for consistent issue handling` pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py Added methods for consistent issue handling. Implemented methods to create comments and fetch issue details.	+70/-2
pr_similar_issue.py `Update PRSimilarIssue to support GitHub and Bitbucket` pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py Updated to support both GitHub and Bitbucket. Refactored to use provider-specific methods for issue handling.	+21/-25

Documentation

README.md

Update README for Bitbucket support in similar_issue feature

README.md

Updated documentation to reflect Bitbucket support.

Added entries for similar issue feature and actions.

+2/-2

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

Oct 27 '23 06:10 sarbjitsinghgrewal

/review

Nov 15 '23 17:11 mrT23

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

🎯 Main theme: Extending 'similar_issue' feature to support Bitbucket
📝 PR summary: This PR extends the 'similar_issue' feature to support Bitbucket, in addition to the existing support for GitHub. It includes modifications to the BitbucketProvider and GithubProvider classes to handle operations specific to their respective platforms, and updates the PRSimilarIssue class to use the appropriate Git provider based on the issue URL. The README.md file is also updated to reflect the new support for Bitbucket in the 'similar_issue' feature.
📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
🧪 Relevant tests added: No
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR includes a significant amount of new code and changes to existing code, which requires a thorough review to ensure that the new functionality is implemented correctly and that existing functionality is not negatively affected.
🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are logically grouped. However, it would be beneficial to include tests for the new functionality to ensure it works as expected and does not introduce any regressions. Additionally, it would be helpful to include more detailed comments in the code to explain the purpose and functionality of the new methods.

🤖 Code feedback:

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
suggestion	It seems like the BitbucketProvider class is doing too much work. Consider breaking down the class into smaller classes or modules, each with a single responsibility. This would improve the modularity and maintainability of the code. [important]
relevant line	class BitbucketProvider(GitProvider):

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
suggestion	Similar to the BitbucketProvider class, the GithubProvider class could also benefit from being broken down into smaller classes or modules. This would make the code easier to understand and maintain. [important]
relevant line	class GithubProvider(GitProvider):

relevant file	pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py
suggestion	The PRSimilarIssue class seems to be tightly coupled with the BitbucketProvider and GithubProvider classes. Consider introducing an interface or abstract base class for the Git providers, which would make the PRSimilarIssue class more flexible and easier to test. [important]
relevant line	class PRSimilarIssue:

relevant file	README.md
suggestion	The changes to the README.md file are clear and informative. However, it would be helpful to include a section explaining how to use the 'similar_issue' feature with Bitbucket, similar to the existing instructions for GitHub. [medium]
relevant line	\| \| Find similar issue \| :white_check_mark: \| \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \|

✨ Usage guide:

Overview: The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'general suggestions' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation

When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:

pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Nov 15 '23 17:11 github-actions[bot]

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

Dec 05 '23 14:12 mrT23

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

Dec 05 '23 14:12 mrT23

[x] 👍
[ ] 👎

@okotek can you tick these?

Jan 03 '24 22:01 GadiZimerman

/analyze

Jan 28 '24 18:01 mrT23

PR Analysis

Components actions: this screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR, and enables to initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes.

Note that after you check a box, the action will be performed automatically, and the PR will be updated in 30-60 seconds. Refresh the page, if needed, to see the generated response.

file

Components

bitbucket_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+7/-5
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	_parse_issue_url (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+18/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_body (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_user (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_created_at (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_username (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+11/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+14/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_name_for_indexing (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	check_if_issue_pull_request (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_numbers_from_list (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+6/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_similar_issues (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_main_issue (^{method of BitbucketProvider})	+4/-0

github_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_user_id (^{method of GithubProvider})	+1/-1
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues (^{method of GithubProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url (^{method of GithubProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment (^{method of GithubProvider})	+7/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body (^{method of GithubProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number (^{method of GithubProvider})	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments (^{method of GithubProvider})	+4/-0

pr_similar_issue.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ (^{method of PRSimilarIssue})	+7/-11
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	run (^{method of PRSimilarIssue})	+4/-7
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	_process_issue (^{method of PRSimilarIssue})	+4/-3

✨ Usage guide:

Using static code analysis capabilities, the analyze tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

/analyze

Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript. See more information about the tool in the docs.

Jan 31 '24 05:01 mrT23

PR Analysis

Components actions: this screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR, and enables to initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes. Note that after you check a box, the action will be performed automatically by PR-Agent, and the PR will be updated in 30-60 seconds.

file

Changed components

bitbucket_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+7/-5
[x] Test	[ ] Docs	_parse_issue_url ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+18/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_body ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_user ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_created_at ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_username ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+11/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+14/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_name_for_indexing ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	check_if_issue_pull_request ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_numbers_from_list ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+6/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_similar_issues ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_main_issue ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0

github_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_user_id ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+1/-1
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+7/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+4/-0

pr_similar_issue.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+7/-11
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	run ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+4/-7
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	_process_issue ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+4/-3

✨ Usage guide:

Using static code analysis capabilities, the analyze tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

/analyze

Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript. See more information about the tool in the docs.

Jan 31 '24 05:01 mrT23

PR Analysis

Components actions: this screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR, and enables to initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes. Note that after you check a box, the action will be performed automatically by PR-Agent, and the PR will be updated in 30-60 seconds.

file

Changed components

bitbucket_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+7/-5
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	_parse_issue_url ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+18/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_body ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_comment_user ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_created_at ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_username ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+11/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+14/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+3/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_name_for_indexing ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	check_if_issue_pull_request ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_numbers_from_list ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+6/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_similar_issues ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_main_issue ^{(method of BitbucketProvider)}	+4/-0

github_provider.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_user_id ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+1/-1
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_repo_issues ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_url ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_create_comment ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+7/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_body ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	get_issue_number ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+2/-0
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	parse_issue_url_and_get_comments ^{(method of GithubProvider)}	+4/-0

pr_similar_issue.py

[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	__init__ ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+7/-11
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	run ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+4/-7
[ ] Test	[ ] Docs	_process_issue ^{(method of PRSimilarIssue)}	+4/-3

✨ Usage guide:

Using static code analysis capabilities, the analyze tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

/analyze

Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript. See more information about the tool in the docs.

Jan 31 '24 05:01 mrT23

Persistent review updated to latest commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414

Feb 06 '24 07:02 mrT23

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

Feb 06 '24 07:02 mrT23

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

best practice

Use more specific exception handling instead of a broad catch.

Consider using a more specific exception handling instead of a broad except Exception as
e. This will help in identifying the exact type of exceptions that are expected and handle
them accordingly.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [242]

-except Exception as e:
+except SpecificExceptionType as e:

Use accessor methods instead of directly accessing dunder attributes.

Instead of directly accessing the __data attribute of Bitbucket objects, consider using or
implementing accessor methods. Direct access to dunder (double underscore) attributes is
generally discouraged as it breaks encapsulation.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [42]

-self.bitbucket_comment_api_url = self.pr._BitbucketBase__data["links"]["comments"]["href"]
+self.bitbucket_comment_api_url = self.pr.get_comment_api_url()

Add exception handling for external API calls.

It's recommended to handle exceptions for network requests or external API calls. This can
prevent the application from crashing and provide a way to give feedback to the user in
case of errors.

pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [39]

-issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+try:
+    issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+except Exception as e:
+    get_logger().exception(f"Failed to create comment: {e}")

bug

Return all issue numbers from the method instead of just the first one.

For the method get_issue_numbers_from_list, instead of returning within the loop, which
will cause the method to exit after the first iteration, consider collecting all issue
numbers and returning them after the loop. This seems to be the intended behavior based on
the method's name and context.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [363-364]

-for issue_number in int_list:
-    return issue_number
+return int_list

✨ Usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 07 '24 05:02 mrT23

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

best practice

Use more specific exception handling instead of broad exception catching.

Consider using a more specific exception handling instead of a broad except Exception as
e. This will help in identifying the exact type of exception to catch, making the code
more robust and easier to debug.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [242]

-except Exception as e:
+except SpecificExceptionType as e:

Wrap create_comment in try-except for graceful error handling.

The create_comment method call inside the exception block should be wrapped in a
try-except to handle potential failures gracefully, especially since network operations
can fail for various reasons.

pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [39]

-issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+try:
+    issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+except Exception as e:
+    get_logger().exception(f"Failed to create comment: {e}")

security

Use json.loads instead of ast.literal_eval for safer string to list conversion.

Instead of using ast.literal_eval to convert a string representation of a list into a
list, consider using a safer alternative like json.loads if the input format allows. This
avoids potential security risks associated with ast.literal_eval.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [361]

-int_list = ast.literal_eval(issues)
+import json
+int_list = json.loads(issues)

maintainability

Extract API URL construction into a separate method for better readability.

To improve code readability and maintainability, consider extracting the logic for
constructing API URLs into a separate method. This will make the code cleaner and easier
to modify in the future.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [326]

-url = f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"
+def construct_api_url(workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number):
+    return f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"

possible issue

Modify method to return all issue numbers if intended, instead of just the first.

For the get_issue_numbers_from_list method, it seems to return only the first issue number
due to the return statement inside the loop. If the intention is to return all issue
numbers, consider using a generator or modifying the method to return a list of issue
numbers.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [363-364]

-for issue_number in int_list:
-    return issue_number
+return int_list

✨ Usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 07 '24 06:02 mrT23

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

best practice

Use specific exception types for better error handling.

Consider using a more specific exception handling instead of a broad except Exception as
e. This will help in identifying the exact type of exception you're dealing with and
handle it appropriately.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [242-243]

-except Exception as e:
+except SpecificExceptionType as e:
     self.github_user_id = ""

Use json.loads() for parsing JSON strings.

It's recommended to use json.loads() instead of ast.literal_eval() for parsing JSON
strings. This is safer and more standard for handling JSON data.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [361]

-int_list = ast.literal_eval(issues)
+int_list = json.loads(issues)

Add exception handling to create_comment method calls.

Ensure that the create_comment method is properly handling exceptions. This is crucial for
maintaining robust error handling in your application.

pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [39]

-issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+try:
+    issue_main.create_comment("Please set pinecone api key and environment in secrets file")
+except Exception as e:
+    get_logger().exception(f"Failed to create comment: {e}")

enhancement

Simplify HTTP GET requests with requests.get.

Instead of using requests.request("GET", url, headers=headers, data=payload), consider
using the higher-level requests.get(url, headers=headers, json=payload) for simplicity and
readability.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [331]

-response = requests.request("GET", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
+response = requests.get(url, headers=headers, json=payload)

maintainability

Refactor method to separate URL building and HTTP request logic.

For better code readability and maintenance, consider refactoring the
parse_issue_url_and_get_comments method to separate the logic for building the URL and
making the HTTP request.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [323-331]

+def build_comments_url(workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number):
+    return f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"
 workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue)
-import requests
-url = f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"
-payload = {}
-headers = {}
-response = requests.request("GET", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
+url = build_comments_url(workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number)
+response = requests.get(url)

Add missing placeholders or checkmarks to maintain table consistency.

Ensure consistency in the markdown table by adding missing checkmarks or placeholders for
the "Find similar issue" and "Actions" rows to align with the rest of the table structure.
This will improve readability and maintain the structured format of the document.

README.md [116-122]

-|       | Find similar issue                          |   :white_check_mark:    |                         |   :white_check_mark:                          |          |          |       |
-|       | Actions                                     |   :white_check_mark:    |        | :white_check_mark: |          |          |
+|       | Find similar issue                          |   :white_check_mark:    |                         |   :white_check_mark:                          |          |          |       |          |
+|       | Actions                                     |   :white_check_mark:    |        | :white_check_mark: |          |          |       |

✨ Usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 07 '24 06:02 mrT23

PR Review

(Review updated until commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, due to the extensive changes across multiple provider classes and the integration of new functionalities for handling Bitbucket issues. The reviewer needs to understand the existing architecture and ensure the new features align with it while maintaining functionality for both GitHub and Bitbucket.
🏅 Score	75
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	Possible Bug: The method `parse_issue_url_and_get_comments` in `bitbucket_provider.py` uses a hard-coded URL construction which might not be resilient to changes in API endpoints or structure. This could lead to maintenance issues or failures in fetching comments if the Bitbucket API changes.
🔍 Possible issues	Code Duplication: Similar methods for handling issues and comments are implemented in both `github_provider.py` and `bitbucket_provider.py`. This could be refactored to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
🔒 Security concerns	No

Code feedback:

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
suggestion	Consider using a configuration or environment variable for the Bitbucket API base URL to make the code more adaptable to changes in the API endpoint. This change enhances maintainability and reduces the risk of issues during API updates. [important]
relevant line	url = f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
suggestion	Implement error handling for the HTTP requests in methods like `parse_issue_url_and_create_comment` to manage potential failures in network calls or API limits. This would improve the robustness of the application. [important]
relevant line	response = requests.request("POST", url, headers=headers, data=payload)

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
suggestion	Refactor the duplicated logic for issue handling in both GitHub and Bitbucket provider classes into a base class or a utility module to reduce code duplication and simplify maintenance. [important]
relevant line	def get_issue_url(self, issue):

relevant file	pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
suggestion	Validate the response status and content type in `parse_issue_url_and_get_comments` to ensure the API call was successful and the response is in the expected format before processing it. This adds a layer of reliability to the data handling process. [medium]
relevant line	return response.json()['values']

✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview: The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 09 '24 09:02 mrT23

Persistent review updated to latest commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414

Feb 09 '24 09:02 mrT23

/custom_suggestions --pr_custom_suggestions.prompt="The suggestions should focus only on the following: (1) untreated edge cases; (2) major bugs; (3) lack of documentation"

Feb 15 '24 14:02 mrT23

PR Custom Suggestions

Suggestions

Error handling

Add exception handling for the HTTP request in the parse_issue_url_and_get_comments method.

The parse_issue_url_and_get_comments method uses the requests library to make a GET
request. However, it doesn't handle potential exceptions that might occur during the
request. It's recommended to wrap the request in a try-except block to handle possible
exceptions such as requests.exceptions.RequestException.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [322-332]

+import requests
+from requests.exceptions import RequestException
+
 def parse_issue_url_and_get_comments(self, issue):
     workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue)
-    import requests
 
     url = f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"
 
     payload = {}
     headers = {}
 
-    response = requests.request("GET", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
-    return response.json()['values']
+    try:
+        response = requests.request("GET", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
+        return response.json()['values']
+    except RequestException as e:
+        raise Exception("Failed to get comments from issue") from e

Add exception handling for the HTTP request in the parse_issue_url_and_create_comment method.

The parse_issue_url_and_create_comment method doesn't handle potential exceptions that
might occur during the POST request. It's recommended to wrap the request in a try-except
block to handle possible exceptions such as requests.exceptions.RequestException.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [334-347]

+import requests
+from requests.exceptions import RequestException
+
 def parse_issue_url_and_create_comment(self, similar_issues_str, issue_url, original_issue_number):
     workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue_url)
     url = f"https://api.bitbucket.org/2.0/repositories/{workspace_slug}/{repo_name}/issues/{original_issue_number}/comments"
     payload = json.dumps({
     "content": {
         "raw": similar_issues_str
     }
     })
     headers = {
     'Authorization': f'Bearer {get_settings().get("BITBUCKET.BEARER_TOKEN", None)}',
     'Content-Type': 'application/json'
     }
 
-    response = requests.request("POST", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
+    try:
+        response = requests.request("POST", url, headers=headers, data=payload)
+    except RequestException as e:
+        raise Exception("Failed to create comment on issue") from e

Add exception handling for the comment creation in the parse_issue_url_and_create_comment method.

The parse_issue_url_and_create_comment method doesn't handle potential exceptions that
might occur during the comment creation. It's recommended to wrap the comment creation in
a try-except block to handle possible exceptions.

pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [463-469]

 def parse_issue_url_and_create_comment(self, similar_issues_str, issue_url, original_issue_number):
     repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue_url)
     try:
         issue = self.repo_obj.get_issue(original_issue_number)
         issue.create_comment(similar_issues_str)
     except Exception as e:
         get_logger().exception(f"Failed to create issue comment, error: {e}")
+        raise Exception("Failed to create issue comment") from e

Add exception handling for the comment creation in the run method.

The run method doesn't handle potential exceptions that might occur during the comment
creation. It's recommended to wrap the comment creation in a try-except block to handle
possible exceptions.

pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [103-152]

 async def run(self):
     get_logger().info('Getting issue...')
     issue_main, original_issue_number = self.git_provider.get_issue(self.issue_url.split('=')[-1])
     issue_str, comments, number = self._process_issue(issue_main)
     openai.api_key = get_settings().openai.key
     get_logger().info('Done')
     ...
     if get_settings().config.publish_output:
-        response = self.git_provider.parse_issue_url_and_create_comment(similar_issues_str, self.issue_url.split('=')[-1], original_issue_number)
+        try:
+            response = self.git_provider.parse_issue_url_and_create_comment(similar_issues_str, self.issue_url.split('=')[-1], original_issue_number)
+        except Exception as e:
+            get_logger().exception(f"Failed to create issue comment, error: {e}")
+            raise Exception("Failed to create issue comment") from e
     get_logger().info(similar_issues_str)
     get_logger().info('Done')

✨ Usage guide:

Overview: The custom_suggestions tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates custom suggestions for improving the PR code.

Unlike the improve tool, which offers more general suggestion according to a pre-configured set of rules, the custom_suggestions tool will only propose suggestion that follow specific guidelines defined by the prompt in: pr_custom_suggestions.prompt configuration.

The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, use the following template:

/custom_suggestions --pr_custom_suggestions.prompt="The suggestions should focus only on the following:\n-...\n-...\n-..."

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_custom_suggestions]
prompt="""\
The suggestions should focus only on the following:
-...
-...
-...
"""

Using a configuration file is recommended, since it allows to use multi-line instructions.

Don't forget - with this tool, you are the prompter. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. You might benefit from several trial-and-error iterations, until you get the correct prompt for your use case.

Example usage

Here is an example for a possible prompt:

[pr_custom_suggestions]
prompt="""\
The suggestions should focus only on the following:
- look for edge cases when implementing a new function
- make sure every variable has a meaningful name
- make sure the code is efficient
"""

The instructions above are just an example. We want to emphasize that the prompt should be specific and clear, and be tailored to the needs of your project.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the custom suggestions usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 15 '24 14:02 mrT23

/help

Feb 21 '24 08:02 GadiZimerman

PR Agent Walkthrough

🤖 Welcome to the PR Agent, an AI-powered tool for automated pull request analysis, feedback, suggestions and more.

Here is a list of tools you can use to interact with the PR Agent:

Tool	Description	Run this command :gem:
DESCRIBE	Generates PR description - title, type, summary, code walkthrough and labels	[ ] Send
REVIEW	Adjustable feedback about the PR, possible issues, security concerns, review effort and more	[ ] Send
IMPROVE	Code suggestions for improving the PR.	[ ] Send
ANALYZE 💎	Identifies code components that changed in the PR, and enables to interactively generate tests, docs, and code suggestions for each component.	[ ] Send
UPDATE CHANGELOG	Automatically updates the changelog.	[ ] Send
ADD DOCUMENTATION 💎	Generates documentation to methods/functions/classes that changed in the PR.	[ ] Send
ASK	Answering free-text questions about the PR.	[*]
GENERATE CUSTOM LABELS	Generates custom labels for the PR, based on specific guidelines defined by the user	[*]
TEST 💎	Generates unit tests for a specific component, based on the PR code change.	[*]
CI FEEDBACK 💎	Generates feedback and analysis for a failed CI job.	[*]
CUSTOM SUGGESTIONS 💎	Generates custom suggestions for improving the PR code, based on specific guidelines defined by the user.	[*]
SIMILAR ISSUE	Automatically retrieves and presents similar issues.	[*]

(1) Note that each tool be invoked automatically when a new PR is opened, or called manually by commenting on a PR.

(2) Tools marked with [*] require additional parameters to be passed. For example, to invoke the /ask tool, you need to comment on a PR: /ask "What is the purpose of this PR?". See the relevant documentation for each tool for more details.

Feb 21 '24 08:02 qodo-code-review[bot]

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
best practice	Use specific exceptions for error handling. Consider using a more specific exception handling instead of the broad `Exception` in the `get_user_id` method. This will help in identifying the exact cause of failure and handle it appropriately. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [242-243] `-except Exception as e: +except SpecificException as e: # Replace SpecificException with the actual exception you're expecting self.github_user_id = ""`
	Use specific exceptions for error handling. Replace the broad `except` clause with more specific exceptions to avoid catching unexpected errors and to make error handling more precise. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [454-455] `-except: +except SpecificException: # Replace SpecificException with the actual exception you're expecting return ""`
	Move the import statement to the top of the file. Ensure that the `requests` library is imported at the beginning of the file. This will prevent potential runtime errors due to the `requests` library not being available in the scope where it's used. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [324] `+# Ensure this import is at the top of the file import requests`

maintainability

Use methods instead of direct attribute access for encapsulation.

Avoid using direct attribute access (_BitbucketBase__data) as it breaks encapsulation and
can lead to maintenance issues. Consider adding a method in the BitbucketBase class to
expose the necessary data in a controlled manner.

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [42-43]

-self.bitbucket_comment_api_url = self.pr._BitbucketBase__data["links"]["comments"]["href"]
-self.bitbucket_pull_request_api_url = self.pr._BitbucketBase__data["links"]['self']['href']
+self.bitbucket_comment_api_url = self.pr.get_comment_api_url()
+self.bitbucket_pull_request_api_url = self.pr.get_pull_request_api_url()

enhancement

Parse the issue URL once and reuse the parsed values.

Instead of splitting the issue_url multiple times, consider parsing it once at the
beginning of the method and reusing the parsed values. This will improve code readability
and efficiency.

pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [105]

-issue_main, original_issue_number = self.git_provider.get_issue(self.issue_url.split('=')[-1])
+parsed_issue_url = self.issue_url.split('=')[-1]
+issue_main, original_issue_number = self.git_provider.get_issue(parsed_issue_url)

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Feb 28 '24 09:02 mrT23

Persistent review updated to latest commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414

Feb 28 '24 09:02 mrT23

/describe

Feb 28 '24 09:02 mrT23

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/commit/f995b3e81e41e98c2efb6e287642219f0e9fd414)

[x] Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

Feb 28 '24 09:02 qodo-code-review[bot]

/test

Feb 29 '24 06:02 mrT23

❌ PR-Agent: Missing component name in test command.

Please provide a component name when running the tool: /test <component_name>.

✨ Test tool usage guide:

The test tool generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes. It can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

/test component_name

where 'component_name' is the name of a specific component in the PR. To get a list of the components that changed in the PR, use the analyze tool. Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript.

Configuration options:

num_tests: number of tests to generate. Default is 3.
testing_framework: the testing framework to use. If not set, for Python it will use pytest, for Java it will use JUnit, for C++ it will use Catch2, and for JavaScript and TypeScript it will use jest.
avoid_mocks: if set to true, the tool will try to avoid using mocks in the generated tests. Note that even if this option is set to true, the tool might still use mocks if it cannot generate a test without them. Default is true.
extra_instructions: Optional extra instructions to the tool. For example: "use the following mock injection scheme: ...".
file: in case there are several components with the same name, you can specify the relevant file.
class_name: in case there are several components with the same name in the same file, you can specify the relevant class name.

See more information about the test tool in the docs.

Feb 29 '24 06:02 qodo-code-review[bot]

PR Code Suggestions

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Mar 03 '24 15:03 mrT23

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
Enhancement	Use a more descriptive variable name for the repository slug. Consider using a more descriptive variable name than `workspace_slug`. The name `workspace_slug` might be misleading, as it suggests that it's a slug for a workspace, but it's actually a slug for a repository. A more descriptive name like `repo_slug` would be more appropriate. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [242] `-workspace_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue_url) +repo_slug, repo_name, original_issue_number = self._parse_issue_url(issue_url)`
	Remove the try-except block for converting `issue_number_similar` to an integer. It seems like you're using a try-except block to handle the case where `issue_number_similar` cannot be converted to an integer. However, if `issue_number_similar` is not a valid integer, it will still raise a `ValueError`. Consider removing the try-except block and let the error propagate up to the caller. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [361-364] `-try: - int_list = ast.literal_eval(issues) - int_list = [int(x) for x in int_list] - for issue_number in int_list: - return issue_number -except ValueError: - return None +int_list = ast.literal_eval(issues) +int_list = [int(x) for x in int_list] +for issue_number in int_list: + return issue_number`
	Remove the try-except block for converting `issue_number_similar` to an integer. It seems like you're using a try-except block to handle the case where `issue_number_similar` cannot be converted to an integer. However, if `issue_number_similar` is not a valid integer, it will still raise a `ValueError`. Consider removing the try-except block and let the error propagate up to the caller. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [370] `-try: - issue_number_similar = int(issue_number_similar) -except ValueError: - return None +issue_number_similar = int(issue_number_similar)`
	Remove the `return` statement inside the loop in `get_issue_numbers_from_list` method. The `get_issue_numbers_from_list` method seems to be returning the first issue number in the list. If you want to return all issue numbers, you should remove the `return` statement inside the loop. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [363-364] `for issue_number in int_list: - return issue_number + print(issue_number)`
	Remove the `return` statement inside the loop in `get_issue_numbers_from_list` method. The `get_issue_numbers_from_list` method seems to be returning the first issue number in the list. If you want to return all issue numbers, you should remove the `return` statement inside the loop. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [511-512] `for issue_number in int_list: - return issue_number + print(issue_number)`
	Automate the updating of the README table. The table in the README file seems to have been manually updated. Consider automating this process to ensure consistency across all tools. README.md [113-125] \| \| ⮑ Extended \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| Reflect and Review \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| Update CHANGELOG.md \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| Find similar issue \| :white_check_mark: \| \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| \| Add Documentation \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| USAGE \| CLI \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| App / webhook \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| \| Tagging bot \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| -\| \| Actions \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| +\| \| Actions \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| \| \| \| \| Web server \| \| \| \| \| \| :white_check_mark: \| -\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| +\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| CORE \| PR compression \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \| :white_check_mark: \|
Possible issue	Add error handling for invalid issue URLs or non-existent repositories. Consider adding error handling for the case where `self.git_provider.parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj(issue_url.split('=')[-1])` returns None. This would prevent potential issues if the issue URL is not valid or if the repository does not exist. pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [27] `-self.git_provider.repo_obj = self.git_provider.parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj(issue_url.split('=')[-1]) +repo_obj = self.git_provider.parse_issue_url_and_get_repo_obj(issue_url.split('=')[-1]) +if repo_obj is None: + raise ValueError("Invalid issue URL or repository does not exist") +self.git_provider.repo_obj = repo_obj`
Performance	Avoid redundant method calls by storing the result in a variable. It seems like the `self.git_provider.get_repo_name_for_indexing(repo_obj)` method is being called twice. Consider storing the result in a variable and reusing it. This would improve performance by avoiding redundant method calls. pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [30] `-repo_name_for_index = self.repo_name_for_index = self.git_provider.get_repo_name_for_indexing(repo_obj) +repo_name_for_index = self.git_provider.get_repo_name_for_indexing(repo_obj) +self.repo_name_for_index = repo_name_for_index`
	Avoid redundant method calls by storing the result in a variable. The `self.git_provider.get_issue_url(issue)` method is being called twice. Consider storing the result in a variable and reusing it. This would improve performance by avoiding redundant method calls. pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [148] `-url = self.git_provider.get_issue_url(issue) +issue_url = self.git_provider.get_issue_url(issue) +url = issue_url`
	Avoid redundant method calls by storing the result in a variable. The `self.git_provider.get_issue_comment_body(comment)` method is being called twice. Consider storing the result in a variable and reusing it. This would improve performance by avoiding redundant method calls. pr_agent/tools/pr_similar_issue.py [208] `-comment_body = self.git_provider.get_issue_comment_body(comment) +comment_body_str = self.git_provider.get_issue_comment_body(comment) +comment_body = comment_body_str`

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Mar 03 '24 15:03 mrT23

PR Code Suggestions

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview: The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality

While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions :gem: tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.

/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.

/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.

/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.

/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

/add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.

/generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.

/analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Mar 03 '24 15:03 mrT23

Generating PR code suggestions

Work in progress ...

Mar 03 '24 15:03 mrT23