Joshie
Joshie
Instead of sutb files, what would it take to drop older python version support (like 2.x), and provide inline type hints? This is directional where the language is growing.
Because I know this will take a while to get to, just let me know when (or if) you are going to merge this. Because it also requires the change...
It is a 3.13 addition. Unfortunately
I might be missing something, but: > Not providing anything would match the first overload, i.e. Item[None] and thus set the value to None by default; Doesn't do what you...
The current behavior does default the TypeVar with an initialized class. But it does not provide that info for the type: I was only checking it with `type` usage.
@Enegg thank you for taking a look! Yea, I know a lot of things here are shifted around. This PR is not ready to be looked at anymore. Yes, there...
Going to wait for #1449 before I work on this more. Also, after talking with @onerandomusername, I am going to move `typing_extensions` outside `TYPE_CHECKING` for `TypeVar` so we can consume...
After thinking about this more, I am not sure that this needs to be solved as a `FAST` based rule. This should either be a new lint or something a...
In principle, I agree with you, Jelle. In practice, the challenge is that some people use `Annotated` "wrong" (¿in incompatible ways?). Both users and library authors. Use and consume wrong...
Hey, I see this PR has not had any movement in the last month. If you don't mind, I think I am going to pick it up. I will include...