New Topic: Open Source

[Dusch4593]

Description

The following major work was done in this PR:

• Added "Open Source" to the tags.md file.
• Created a brand new "Open Source" topic file. (General concept entry removed)
• Created a new Open Source concept called "Open Source Software".
  • Includes an extensive table listing different frameworks, languages, etc., that are OSS.
• Migrated a lot of General concept entries into the Open Source topic**.
  • This is both to buff up the new Open Source topic and thin out/refocus the General topic.
  • **Also migrated entries for "Ruby on Rails" and "React Native" into Ruby and React topics, respectively.
• Removed the General: Cloud Computing entry in anticipation of #930 being merged before this one.
  • This is to prevent potential merge conflicts.
• Revised as many links via SourceGraph that would have broken otherwise. (Let me know if you find any more 😄)
• Some moderate word-smithing.

Note: This is a huge pull request, so let's conduct at least four (4) reviews.

Type of Change

• Adding new entries
• Editing an existing entry (fixing a typo, bug, issues, etc)
• Updating the documentation

Checklist

• [x] All writings are my own.
• [x] My entry follows the Codecademy Docs style guide.
• [x] My changes generate no new warnings.
• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own writing and code.
• [x] I have checked my entry and corrected any misspellings.
• [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed.
• [x] I have confirmed my changes are not being pushed from my forked main branch.
• [x] I have confirmed that I'm pushing from a new branch named after the changes I'm making.
• [x] Under "Development" on the right, I have linked any issues that are relevant to this PR (write "Closes # in the "Description" above).

[SSwiniarski]

@Dusch4593, I deleted the General: Cloud Computing entry in my PR. Is this going to cause a problem?

[Dusch4593]

@Dusch4593, I deleted the General: Cloud Computing entry in my PR. Is this going to cause a problem?

I don't think it should as long as our separate PRs didn't make separate/different changes in the same file(s).

[SSwiniarski]

@Dusch4593, it turns out that we're both making changes to the GraphQL entry.

[Dusch4593]

@Dusch4593, it turns out that we're both making changes to the GraphQL entry.

True. I wanted to make some changes as well as move the GraphQL entry inside the open source topic. To prevent conflicts, could we do the following:

• In this PR, I'll incorporate the changes to the entry you made in your PR.
• After I let you know I made those edits, could you remove the GraphQL entry from your PR altogether?

[SSwiniarski]

@Dusch4593, it turns out that we're both making changes to the GraphQL entry.

True. I wanted to make some changes as well as move the GraphQL entry inside the open source topic. To prevent conflicts, could we do the following:

• In this PR, I'll incorporate the changes to the entry you made in your PR.
• After I let you know I made those edits, could you remove the GraphQL entry from your PR altogether?

@Dusch4593 Sounds good.

[Dusch4593]

@SSwiniarski Ok, the changes were made 😄

[Dusch4593]

@SSwiniarski Finished implementing your feedback. I had just one follow-up question to one of your comments/suggestions.

[SSwiniarski]

@Dusch4593, it turns out that we're both making changes to the GraphQL entry.

True. I wanted to make some changes as well as move the GraphQL entry inside the open source topic. To prevent conflicts, could we do the following:

• In this PR, I'll incorporate the changes to the entry you made in your PR.
• After I let you know I made those edits, could you remove the GraphQL entry from your PR altogether?

@Dusch4593 Sounds good.

@Dusch4593 I removed my edits to the GraphQL entry in my PR so we should avoid a conflict. The only changes I was making was bolding the first occurrence of "GraphQL" and linking the reference to "cloud services" to the new Cloud Computing topic.

[Dusch4593]

@HishamT Just finished implemented most of your feedback. Let me know if there's anything I missed. 😄

[Dusch4593]

@HishamT Implemented your feedback.

cc: @KTom101 @yangc95 Let's get 1-2 more reviews for this PR before we merge 😄

[Dusch4593]

@KTom101 Thank you very much for looking over these files and leaving feedback! I've implemented the new changes along with a few extra edits including reducing the width of the Linux Torvalds image by half (currently, the image is gigantic and obscures the opening text upon first page load).

[Dusch4593]

Hey @KTom101 I believe I implemented all of your feedback in 9652fe7675a1830c167f32f04d44fdbd7bc6c858. I also deleted the git.md file under General since there is an entire Git topic already.

[Dusch4593]

@KTom101 Just realized this morning that the table never got fixed 😅 But it should be fixed now!

[Dusch4593]

@KTom101 Was there anything left to add, change, or check before merging?

[Dusch4593]

@yangc95 Changes implemented 😄

[Dusch4593]

@SSwiniarski @yangc95 @KTom101 @HishamT Thank you so much to everyone for their input and feedback for this new topic. This one was a long time coming. 😄 Live link for the new entries below:

Open Source (topic): https://www.codecademy.com/resources/docs/open-source Open Source Software (concept): https://www.codecademy.com/resources/docs/open-source/open-source-software