Fix #1066: Added time-stamper for Day Plan TOC timings
Added
Deploy request for cyf-curriculum pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Deploy request for cyf-piscine pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Deploy request for cyf-common pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Deploy request for cyf-tracks pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Deploy Preview for cyf-sdc ready!
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 7acc7d6f1138f0d8bef758136cf64cf9b7031aad |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/cyf-sdc/deploys/6906bc4854d4aa0008521dff |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-1623--cyf-sdc.netlify.app |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.
Deploy request for cyf-itd pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Deploy request for cyf-launch pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 34b4e611e7924b7497bcd96611f830d52e1d05a2 |
Hi @CodeYourFuture,
I’ve submitted this pull request (#1623) to fix the issue with the time-stamper for Day Plan TOC timings. Could you please review it when you get a chance? Your feedback and approval will be much appreciated so it can be merged.
Thank you!
Best regards, YerrabothulaNavyaSree09
This looks like it breaks the display?
In the deploy preview, I now see this:
But what I'm expecting to see is something like:
10:00 Morning orientation
10:20 How we work
10:30 Goals
...
How did you test this locally? How are you approaching trying to fix this?