jazzer icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
jazzer copied to clipboard

Hook is not removed when generating coverage report

Open tkmikan opened this issue 1 year ago • 3 comments

TLDR: Hooks are not removed after fuzz ends, while their classpath is removed.

Details: I am fuzzing some code taking user input as ArrayList size e.g.

someArrayList = new ArrayList<>(data.consumeInt());

If the fuzzer provides a large int, it will take large memory and long time, so I write a hook to avoid this like:

public final class HugeArrayHooks {
    @MethodHook(type = HookType.BEFORE, targetClassName = "java.util.ArrayList", targetMethod = "<init>", targetMethodDescriptor = "(I)V")
    public static void initHugeArray(MethodHandle method, Object thisObject, Object[] arguments, int hookId) {
        int size = (int) arguments[0];
        if (size > 0x10000) {
            throw new RuntimeException("too large");
        }
    }

}

However, with this hook, exception is raised when generating coverage report.

The cause is, my hook is effective for Pattern.java:1775 new ArrayList<>(10);, but the classpath argument does not work here, resulting in a NoClassDefFoundError.

Stacktrace:

Exception in thread "Thread-2" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/example/hook/HugeArrayHooks
	at java.base/java.util.regex.Pattern.compile(Pattern.java:1775)
	at java.base/java.util.regex.Pattern.<init>(Pattern.java:1430)
	at java.base/java.util.regex.Pattern.compile(Pattern.java:1069)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.third_party.nonapi.io.github.classgraph.scanspec.AcceptReject.globToPattern(AcceptReject.java:585)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.third_party.nonapi.io.github.classgraph.scanspec.AcceptReject$AcceptRejectWholeString.addToReject(AcceptReject.java:304)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.third_party.io.github.classgraph.ClassGraph.rejectPackages(ClassGraph.java:891)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.analyzeAllUncoveredClasses(CoverageRecorder.kt:225)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.analyzeCoverage(CoverageRecorder.kt:193)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.computeFileCoverage(CoverageRecorder.kt:79)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.dumpCoverageReport(CoverageRecorder.kt:73)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.dumpCoverageReport$default(CoverageRecorder.kt:71)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.instrumentor.CoverageRecorder.dumpCoverageReport(CoverageRecorder.kt)
	at com.code_intelligence.jazzer.driver.FuzzTargetRunner.shutdown(FuzzTargetRunner.java:445)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

I haven't looked into jazzer's implementation about classloader and instrumention. Some possible fix may be use separate classloaders for fuzzing and others(not hook), or reload/restore after fuzzing.

tkmikan avatar Oct 25 '23 17:10 tkmikan

Could you provide the steps that lead to that stack trace? How are you running fuzzing with your hook and how are you collecting coverage?

fmeum avatar Oct 25 '23 18:10 fmeum

To reproduce from jazzer examples, add the above hook function to com.example.ExampleFuzzerHooks, and

./jazzer --cp=examples/src/main/java --target_class=com.example.ExampleFuzzer --custom_hooks=com.example.ExampleFuzzerHooks --coverage_report=report

tkmikan avatar Oct 25 '23 18:10 tkmikan

@tkmikan - thanks for the feedback on this issue. Are you still using Jazzer? You may have seen there haven't been any updates for a while.... We stopped maintaining Jazzer/Jazzer.js as open source. But we'd be happy to understand what you're trying to achieve with it, and help you if we can! For example, maybe our AI-powered fuzz testing platform is the superior choice... Ping me if interested? Ping me? david[dot]merian [at] code-intelligence[dot]com

ghost avatar Feb 26 '24 11:02 ghost