closure_tree icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
closure_tree copied to clipboard

Warning of hierarchy class constant already defined

Open ryanb opened this issue 5 years ago • 9 comments

I'm seeing warnings in the log when reloading a page in development after altering a model that has closure_tree added.

/Users/rbates/.rbenv/versions/2.5.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/closure_tree-7.1.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: already initialized constant CategoryHierarchy
/Users/rbates/.rbenv/versions/2.5.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0/gems/closure_tree-7.1.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: previous definition of CategoryHierarchy was here

I've tested this in a new Rails app and confirmed it happens in the latest version of Rails (6.0.2.2).

I haven't noticed any other issues, but it would be nice to remove these warnings.

ryanb avatar Apr 24 '20 16:04 ryanb

facing the same warning: rails 6.0.0 closure_tree 7.1.0

jimhj avatar Jun 20 '20 08:06 jimhj

I have the same warnings.

ruby: 2.7.1 rails: 6.0.3.2 closure_tree: 7.1.0

phlegx avatar Jul 09 '20 14:07 phlegx

Have the same problem!

/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/closure_tree-7.2.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: already initialized constant UserHierarchy
/Users/admin/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/closure_tree-7.2.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: previous definition of UserHierarchy was here

ruby: 2.7.2 rails: 6.0.3.4 closure_tree: 7.2.0

vutran0111 avatar Dec 19 '20 12:12 vutran0111

Have the same problem!

/Users/kevyn/.rbenv/versions/2.6.6/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/closure_tree-7.2.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: already initialized constant SectionHierarchy
/Users/kevyn/.rbenv/versions/2.6.6/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/closure_tree-7.2.0/lib/closure_tree/support.rb:36: warning: previous definition of SectionHierarchy was here

ruby: 2.6.6 rails: 6.1.0 closure_tree: 7.2.0

kevynlebouille avatar Dec 30 '20 16:12 kevynlebouille

It is probably related to way how hierarchy class is created on the fly

https://github.com/ClosureTree/closure_tree/blob/22bbbf191c9c964fe45c7c361e4ee812e586f2af/lib/closure_tree/support.rb#L36

and Zeitwerk is not unloading it in rails during reload.

@fxn is there anything we can do about to fix this, any idea?

simi avatar Feb 24 '21 18:02 simi

Hey! I have written a Hello World app following the README. Let's suppose the model is Tag.

TagHierarchy is a top-level constant defined by hand in Object. It is no different than Nokogiri, it is a constant in Object that it has not been autoloaded, therefore, it is not reloaded. Since Object is not reloaded (because it has not been autoloaded), the constants it stores that have not been autoloaded remain there untouched, like String.

I believe there are some options depending on use cases:

  1. If it is expected that users edit the migration of the hierarchy auxiliary table, you may remove_const the constant if present and define it again to have things refreshed.
  2. Alternatively, you can define the constant below model_class, instead of below Object. In that case, when the model class is reloaded, you'll get a fresh new Tag::TagHierarchy again. That is the same principle that applies to autoloaded namespaces, if you have Admin::UsersController, just by unloading Admin, the child UsersController is gone, and you start everything afresh.
  3. If TagHierarchy is internal and remains untouched for all practical purposes, you could just return hierarchy_class if const_defined? (off the top of my head).

Does that help? Please, do not hesitate to ask more questions!

fxn avatar Feb 24 '21 20:02 fxn

Any updates here? Still get these warnings in development environment, because of how Zeitwerk work

ruby: 2.6.1 rails: 6.1.4.4 closure_tree: 7.4.0

gambala avatar Feb 06 '22 16:02 gambala

@gambala No, this problem wasn't tackled yet (sadly). Xavier (author of Zeitwerk) pointed out 3 possible solutions. Personally I would go with 1. for now. But I'm not 100% sure this is 100% backwards compatible change.

As a proper solution I think this gem should not define hierarchy model on the fly, but let user/generator create model (backed by classic class in file) and just include ClosureTree::Model concern in there.

:information_source: btw. definition happens here

https://github.com/ClosureTree/closure_tree/blob/f3b33f81157ccf002b8c2774b30dc35bd4722610/lib/closure_tree/support.rb#L36

simi avatar Feb 06 '22 17:02 simi

While this is still open, you can at least avoid the warning if you want. Just depend on Zeitwerk >= 2.5.0, and throw this in an initializer:

unless Rails.application.config.cache_classes
  # See https://github.com/ClosureTree/closure_tree/issues/362.
  Rails.autoloaders.main.on_unload('Tag') do
    Object.send(:remove_const, 'TagHierarchy')
  end
end

fxn avatar Feb 06 '22 18:02 fxn