Tobias Pitters

Just took a look and it seems like we are doing a completely unnecessary deepcopy in `Explanation.__getitem__`. If you have a script reprocing the issue, that would be great

Hmm, the differences look pretty large. Please note that for this example, we just rely on a shap implementation of the xgboost repo and just call this under the hood,...

yes, seems like the implementation differs

I can't reproduce the issue on master and on v0.46.0. I used the model `model_path = "fxmarty/really-tiny-falcon-testing"`. Glad if you could provide more details.

@fomightez do you run the code from the first post?

Thanks for your interest in shap. This sounds interesting and is indeed an useful feature for this library. If we can support you in any way, don't shy away from...

Thanks for adding me. Would be great if you could create a PR, so that we can discuss specific points in the code once you feel you are ready for...

@jameslamb you're right. I think we can start supporting python 3.13 as soon as #3861 passes.

@btat-qc yes, tests are passing and we support python 3.13 on master. I renamed this ticket to track the progress on Python 3.13 support on the remaining dependencies. We can...

All packages support python 3.13!