Christoph Zwerschke
Christoph Zwerschke
Would this be solved with #213?
@mgedmin thanks for the quick response. Yes, I am using both pyproject.toml and setup.py for backward compatibility. Regarding the `include`/`exclude` settings in tool.poetry, unfortunately they affect both wheels and source...
Yes, it boils down to the question how to build the sdist when both setup.py and pyproject.toml exist. The suggested option would be a solution. Or just build both ways...
Thanks for the quick reply. You're right, if you just let the client refresh the access token, then you just need to provide a refresh endpoint on the server that...
Another interesting approach is taken by PostGraphile, where the [security](https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/security/) is pushed down even further, to the database level. Maybe this could be provided as an alternative option.
@claremacrae Did you notice that there is a 0.2 constant in the "else if" branch as well? As far as I see, it should suffice to change both of these...
> where did the calculation 1/60 come from The original constant (from TaskWarrior) was 0.2. However, in our function, after the calculation of the score, it is multiplied with the...
So maybe it should not be hardcoded as 1/60, but set to 0.2/dueCoefficient.
> Just as a note: in Taskwarrior, the value _is_ `0.2 * 12`, not `0.2`. If I read their code correctly. Ah, ok, they too have that dueCoefficient. That would...
But then, if we fix the table, not the formula, we would have the original problem again that the actionable task with default prio would be ranked lower than the...