ED_Lib
ED_Lib copied to clipboard
why different opencv?
Thanks for great job for line and circle detection. After run test_ED, opencv(4.5.2) & EDLIB show different run time but same results(no diff between pixel), as follows: testED.getEdgeImage() (Original) : 48.5386 detectEdges() (OpenCV) : 15.8752 different pixel count : 0 ------------------------------------------------- testEDLines.getLineImage() : 7.61791 detectLines() (OpenCV) : 22.7407 different pixel count : 0 Also, opencv consumes less total time(include detectEdge and detectLine). Any difference in function implemention?
maybe you will get slight pixel differences if you try another image. the reason OpenCV and original code uses different nfa computation. anyway i am still working on the code to get better and all feedback is appreciated.
Thank you for your reply! I will try different input and follow your works. Best wishes!