Christopher Rackauckas
Christopher Rackauckas
What's left here?
@avik-pal update Boltz?
What's the state of this?
0 ~ a + 0*b -0*b ~ 1*a b ~ -1/0 * a
We can make this return NaN
Indeed it seems like the `islinear` function is currently not complex-aware so it it throws more safety errors than it should. This function should get expanded. I think solve_for may...
Should this `exchange ` function be added to SymPyPythonCall? Is there some issue with having `symbolics_to_sympy(ex)` find the variables and do such a conversion automatically without requiring the named symbols...
It would be possible but it hasn't been implemented yet.
It should just point to the NonlinearSolve docs. Folding this into NonlinearSolve.jl's repo might make sense.
Can you show the error?