Chris Maddock

I've ran this in the debugger, I think this is a duplicate of nunit/nunit#3063. I'm not too sure what you were seeing last night, Terje - when I run the...

FWIW, you get the equivalent effect if you try and filter on the test in the Console. ``` "C:\Users\Chris\Documents\git\nunit3-vs-adapter.issues\Issue640\bin\Debug\net472\FQN.dll" --test FQN.Issue761.Test_01("\uffff") ```

@mzboray - could you try running this in the NUnit Console with `--domain=None` specified, and see if that works as required? @OsirisTerje - if so, this would be another one...

Thanks @mzboray! Sorry, was browsing on my phone, didn’t realise you’d already found that. 😊

Hi @OsirisTerje, Was just coming to clarify, but looks like @RoPe311 has beaten me to it! All that I think is necessary is allowing the parameterization of the string `nunit3`...

Hi Terje - looks like we fixed the issue with services in #719? It looks like you've written the code for this feature in https://github.com/nunit/nunit3-vs-adapter/commit/09afe86bee6b1645b2f6b8fb2f38699a01c119ab, but I'm not sure that...

This should probably also be aware that `[TestFixture]` is optional. @CharliePoole would do a better job of explaining the specifics that I can, but I think any class that contains...

I always worried about the "entry-barrier" for new contributors to adding in something like this, but I think I've now come to the conclusion that this is the lesser evil,...

I would love to see this in place in v3 also. I personally think the benefits of doing this outweigh the unfortunate cost of limiting the IDEs here.

@rvignesh89 This issue is closely tied to a PR currently in progress - #1850. I imagine how that implementation is made will affect what's necessary here, might just be worth...