Chris Maddock

I should add the above is specifically relating to platforms, as that was the particular element you focussed on in your straw-man. 🙂 I'd like to also expand our backwards...

No, not yet, at least not that I know of. It sounds like a sensible thing to document.

The VSIX's are no longer supported. Can you clarify what you mean by 'easy to ignore', sorry? Is there a particular drawback you're expecting from the adapter being added?

> I'm reflecting back to when the NUnit analyzer was added. I'm still disappointed we never managed to figure that problem out. Incidentally, I came across a case today where...

Great, thanks Terje! It's on the list. 🙂

> Main point I want to make is that by adding any tool to the build through a nuget package, you may be helping some present and future contributors while,...

Hey Joseph - Am I understanding right that your proposal would still allow for the use of sequential runners, just not concurrent? In that case, definitely sounds good to me...

Sounds good! :-)

I'm not sure if we've discussed this before, but one thing I'd really like to have in future is user-extensible test agents, installed in the same way as our current...

Personally, I'm happy with the incremental PRs. I'd be keen for this to be reviewed by more-than-just-me however, so if others would find it helpful... 😄