Chris Maddock

I think we agree on how it should work, but not how it currently does work! 🙂 It was several months ago I wrote the above now, but I'm fairly...

This sounds similar to #325 - which is fixed in the latest _framework_ master, but not in a release yet. What do you think @CharliePoole - worth trying? If it...

Interesting point. I'm not sure I can come up with a reason to feel particularly strongly either way. I agree its inconsistent, however TestPackage is such a fundamental class I...

Here's a thought - will this be affected at all by our plans to split up the API assembly for extensions to help with the versioning? We talked about whether...

Sounds good to me!

I'd encourage everyone to create to create an issue-per-change as normal for this, but due to time, here's a quick brain dump of things I see possibly going in to...

Sounds good. For v4 - I'd like to enforce public/internal classes as aggressively as possible - so we lose as much of this ambiguity as possible. Would you like to...

Oh - I only saw the last response at first. On your other points: - "decide whether to do" totally agree - "Testcentic/nunit reconciliation project" sounds good. Here or on...

Been thinking more about this - I'd like to lay out some high-level key objectives for v4, to give us more focus. Here's some of my thoughts, suggestions welcome! I...

It's a good point Charlie, and one I've thought a lot about. Your suggestion motivated me to start writing them down, and it turned into a small essay I'm afraid....