bladebit
bladebit copied to clipboard
Found 0 valid plots -> chia plots check -g xxx
Testet with switch -compress 0 and without... Plots are not valid.
.\bladebit_cuda.exe -n 100 -t 24 --compress 0 -f XXX -c XXX cudaplot G:\Chia
source bladebit_cuda.exe -> https://downloads.chia.net/bladebit/
Bladebit Chia Plotter Version : 3.0.0-alpha1-dev Git Commit : f269db0a7ad307514e993c335897cea7ebf46eda Compiled With: msvc 19.33.31630
System: 3960x 256GB RAM 3060 12GB
It is currently a known bug on Windows. It will yield bad plots. Fix is pending for next release
It is currently a known bug on Windows. It will yield bad plots. Fix is pending for next release
Thx for the information. Is there a schedule for the next release
made 70tb of plots, and it turns out in vain. does not send proofs of the pool.
Just deleted 400+ plots created by bladebit_cuda. The GUI reported no problems, the number of plots increased but pool payouts stayed the same. Only the chia plots check showed that the plots were incorrect. It's a pity that you wrote so late that the problem is known.
There's a beta/alpha keybase channel, where all the info is being shared (for those who signed up). It was shared there a while back. It would be good to keep an eye there for the latest info.
Regardless of which, it's a good idea to check all the plots until after out of beta, even if it's checking with a low -n
count.
bladebit-cuda-v3.0.0-alpha2 who installed? fixed on the proofs?
bladebit-cuda-v3.0.0-alpha2 who installed? fixed on the proofs?
Yesterday i checkt it with two plots. Version ae066d3 and it not work on windows. Compiled at VS 2022
sad( I waited so long, but alas... I'm going to cry
ubuntu 22.04 bladebit_cuda alpha1 plots is good! alpha2 error cuda(
Ubuntu 22.1 bladebit_cuda alpha1 OK. Plots are valid. Ubuntu 22.1 bladebit_cuda alpha2 does not start plotting: CUDA error: 13 (0xd ) cudaErrorInvalidSymbol : invalid device symbol Ubuntu 22.1 bladebit_cuda alpha3 does not start plotting: CUDA error: 13 (0xd ) cudaErrorInvalidSymbol : invalid device symbol --. Windows 10 bladebit_cuda alpha1 plots are invalid Windows 10 bladebit_cuda alpha3 plots are invalid
Windows 10 bad plots
CUDA error: 13 (0xd ) cudaErrorInvalidSymbol : invalid device symbol
Update to CUDA 12.1 to resolve this issue.
3.0.0-alpha3-dev on win10x64 plot not valid
I get sad when I see that plots are not valid in Windows
Me too. But it's being worked on. I can't currently reproduce it as they come out valid in my windows machine. Will need a bit of a deeper dive.
3.0.0-alpha3-dev on win10x64 plot not valid
To confirm: These plots were made also with 3.0.0-alpha3-dev?
3.0.0-alpha3-dev on win10x64 plot not valid
To confirm: These plots were made also with 3.0.0-alpha3-dev?
Yes, I used https://download.chia.net/bladebit/bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe and "chia plots check" always says is invalid
` Bladebit Chia Plotter Version : 3.0.0-alpha3-dev Git Commit : eb6df030b555fb35addc3d6762424d52826a5d82 Compiled With: msvc 19.33.31630
[Global Plotting Config] Will create 3 plots. Thread count : 48 Warm start enabled : false NUMA disabled : false CPU affinity disabled : false Farmer public key : XXXX Pool contract address : XXX Benchmark mode : disabled
[Bladebit CUDA Plotter] Selected cuda device 0 : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti CUDA Compute Capability : 8.9 SM count : 60 Max blocks per SM : 24 Max threads per SM : 1536 Async Engine Count : 5 L2 cache size : 48.00 MB L2 persist cache max size : 36.00 MB Stack Size : 1.00 KB Memory: Total : 11.99 GB Free : 10.79 GB
Allocating buffers (this may take a few seconds)... Kernel RAM required : 90240524288 bytes ( 86060.07 MiB or 84.04 GiB ) Intermediate RAM required : 2999001088 bytes ( 2860.07 MiB or 2.79 GiB ) Host RAM required : 168443248640 bytes ( 160640.00 MiB or 156.88 GiB ) Total Host RAM required : 258683772928 bytes ( 246700.07 MiB or 240.92 GiB ) GPU RAM required : 6140243968 bytes ( 5855.79 MiB or 5.72 GiB ) Allocating buffers
Generating plot 1 / 3: c6ceae09a77fef4d570c958c7efa37edc8679eec413a1d70630fb388bdad4547 Plot temporary file: E:\ChiaBB\plot-k32-2023-03-12-15-02-c6ceae09a77fef4d570c958c7efa37edc8679eec413a1d70630fb388bdad4547.plot.tmp
Generating F1 Finished F1 in 123.57 seconds. Table 2 completed in 169.84 seconds with 4294893616 entries. Table 3 completed in 29.11 seconds with 4294742176 entries. Table 4 completed in 26.20 seconds with 4294505435 entries. Table 5 completed in 34.58 seconds with 4294005208 entries. Table 6 completed in 21.17 seconds with 4292887672 entries. Table 7 completed in 53.94 seconds with 4290737492 entries. Finalizing Table 7 Finalized Table 7 in 10.09 seconds. Completed Phase 1 in 468.69 seconds Marked Table 6 in 9.35 seconds. Marked Table 5 in 17.08 seconds. Marked Table 4 in 15.95 seconds. Marked Table 3 in 59.42 seconds. Marked Table 2 in 19.91 seconds. Completed Phase 2 in 121.72 seconds Compressing Table 1 and 2... Step 1 completed step in 112.00 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 9.25 seconds. Completed table 1 in 121.25 seconds with 3429192348 / 4294893616 entries ( 79.84% ). Compressing tables 2 and 3... Step 1 completed step in 3.81 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 3.51 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.96 seconds. Completed table 2 in 16.28 seconds with 3439485141 / 4294742176 entries ( 80.09% ). Compressing tables 3 and 4... Step 1 completed step in 5.01 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 3.49 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.87 seconds. Completed table 3 in 17.36 seconds with 3465376160 / 4294505435 entries ( 80.69% ). Compressing tables 4 and 5... Step 1 completed step in 44.05 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 3.48 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.17 seconds. Completed table 4 in 56.70 seconds with 3531677134 / 4294005208 entries ( 82.25% ). Compressing tables 5 and 6... Step 1 completed step in 53.04 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 3.66 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.00 seconds. Completed table 5 in 65.70 seconds with 3711341225 / 4292887672 entries ( 86.45% ). Compressing tables 6 and 7... Step 1 completed step in 66.53 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 3.81 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 17.62 seconds. Completed table 6 in 87.96 seconds with 4290737492 / 4290737492 entries ( 100.00% ). Serializing P7 entries Completed serializing P7 entries in 2.23 seconds. Completed Phase 3 in 367.49 seconds Completed Plot 1 in 957.90 seconds ( 15.97 minutes )
E:\ChiaBB\plot-k32-2023-03-12-15-02-c6ceae09a77fef4d570c958c7efa37edc8679eec413a1d70630fb388bdad4547.plot.tmp -> E:\ChiaBB\plot-k32-2023-03-12-15-02-c6ceae09a77fef4d570c958c7efa37edc8679eec413a1d70630fb388bdad4547.plot Completed writing plot in 14.37 seconds Final plot table pointers: Table 1: 1288942572 ( 0x000000004cd3b3ec ) Table 2: 16127572854 ( 0x00000003c1473b76 ) Table 3: 30108885879 ( 0x0000000702a12377 ) Table 4: 44195443554 ( 0x0000000a4a40f362 ) Table 5: 58551506454 ( 0x0000000da1f11616 ) Table 6: 73637896629 ( 0x00000011252921b5 ) Table 7: 91079495904 ( 0x0000001534c2d0e0 ) C 1 : 4096 ( 0x0000000000001000 ) C 2 : 1720396 ( 0x00000000001a404c ) C 3 : 1720572 ( 0x00000000001a40fc )
Final plot table sizes: Table 1: 14151.22 MiB Table 2: 13333.62 MiB Table 3: 13433.99 MiB Table 4: 13691.01 MiB Table 5: 14387.50 MiB Table 6: 16633.61 MiB Table 7: 16879.36 MiB C 1 : 1.64 MiB C 2 : 0.00 MiB C 3 : 1227.59 MiB
Generating plot 2 / 3: cbfed61caa519329aa8b1782924da233f2a6804308156ca07650b86510403048 .... `
@lokus77 if you could provide a full log like the one mech2you provided above, I'd appreciate it. Trying to gather all info I can on this issue.
SystemName="ADAM-PC-THREADR" OS="Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19045" SystemVendor/Model="Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd./TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI" CPU="AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core Processor (C:24|T:48)" GPU="NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti" GPUSKU="Lovelace" GPUArch="N/A" DriverVersion="528.49" PCIeLink="PCIe 4 x16" DRAM="256GB, 8x32GB , 2666MT/s"
Hardware: -2x Xeon 2650V4 (12c/24T) -256Gb DDR4 2400CL17 ecc (samsung 8x32gb M386A4G40EM2-CRC 32GB 4DRx4 PC4-2400T-LD2-11 ) -Nvidia Geforce 3080Founder 10Gb Vram conected in Pcie3.0 X16 riser -Nvme pcie 3.0 samsung 980 pro 1tb -Huawei RH2288h V3 server (pcie3).
Soft:
- Windows 10 Pro 22H2 Build 19045.2603 "Windows 10 pro for workstations"
- Nvidia 528.49 drivers.
Cmd used: bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe -v -c xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -f xxxxxxxxx -z 0 -n 1 -t 8 cudaplot g:/chia
plots in ubuntu 22.10 (kernel 5.19) Alpha1: About 165 secs -(XFS) P1 66.83s P2 11.13s P3 87.4s Copy time 14.92s Plots in win10: About 310 secs, or 355s in verbose -(NTFS) P1 192 P2 34 P3 129 Copy time 9,5s
LOG verbose -v
Bladebit Chia Plotter Version : 3.0.0-alpha3-dev Git Commit : eb6df030b555fb35addc3d6762424d52826a5d82 Compiled With: msvc 19.33.31630
[Global Plotting Config] Will create 1 plots. Thread count : 8 Warm start enabled : false NUMA disabled : false CPU affinity disabled : false Farmer public key : 93b561exxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Pool contract address : xch1fxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Benchmark mode : disabled
[Bladebit CUDA Plotter] Selected cuda device 0 : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 CUDA Compute Capability : 8.6 SM count : 68 Max blocks per SM : 16 Max threads per SM : 1536 Async Engine Count : 5 L2 cache size : 5.00 MB L2 persist cache max size : 3.75 MB Stack Size : 1.00 KB Memory: Total : 10.00 GB Free : 8.87 GB
Allocating buffers (this may take a few seconds)... Kernel RAM required : 90240524288 bytes ( 86060.07 MiB or 84.04 GiB ) Intermediate RAM required : 2999001088 bytes ( 2860.07 MiB or 2.79 GiB ) Host RAM required : 168443248640 bytes ( 160640.00 MiB or 156.88 GiB ) Total Host RAM required : 258683772928 bytes ( 246700.07 MiB or 240.92 GiB ) GPU RAM required : 6140243968 bytes ( 5855.79 MiB or 5.72 GiB ) Allocating buffers
Generating plot 1 / 1: 3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13 Plot temporary file: g:/chia/plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot.tmp
Generating F1 Finished F1 in 2.92 seconds. Table 2 completed in 8.44 seconds with 4294927287 entries. Table 3 completed in 37.03 seconds with 4294801213 entries. Table 4 completed in 35.40 seconds with 4294532457 entries. Table 5 completed in 36.03 seconds with 4294092532 entries. Table 6 completed in 31.72 seconds with 4293202019 entries. Table 7 completed in 26.73 seconds with 4291433858 entries. Finalizing Table 7 Finalized Table 7 in 13.61 seconds. Completed Phase 1 in 192.19 seconds Marked Table 6 in 6.93 seconds. Marked Table 5 in 6.67 seconds. Marked Table 4 in 6.62 seconds. Marked Table 3 in 6.85 seconds. Marked Table 2 in 6.95 seconds. Completed Phase 2 in 34.03 seconds Compressing Table 1 and 2... Step 1 completed step in 7.81 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 9.11 seconds. Completed table 1 in 16.92 seconds with 3429245768 / 4294927287 entries ( 79.84% ). Compressing tables 2 and 3... Step 1 completed step in 6.27 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.07 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.98 seconds. Completed table 2 in 21.33 seconds with 3439548453 / 4294801213 entries ( 80.09% ). Compressing tables 3 and 4... Step 1 completed step in 6.18 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.10 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.04 seconds. Completed table 3 in 21.32 seconds with 3465446598 / 4294532457 entries ( 80.69% ). Compressing tables 4 and 5... Step 1 completed step in 5.95 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.19 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.06 seconds. Completed table 4 in 21.21 seconds with 3531853268 / 4294092532 entries ( 82.25% ). Compressing tables 5 and 6... Step 1 completed step in 5.96 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.42 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.39 seconds. Completed table 5 in 21.76 seconds with 3711682334 / 4293202019 entries ( 86.45% ). Compressing tables 6 and 7... Step 1 completed step in 6.00 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 7.11 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 10.42 seconds. Completed table 6 in 23.54 seconds with 4291433858 / 4291433858 entries ( 100.00% ). Serializing P7 entries Completed serializing P7 entries in 3.00 seconds. Completed Phase 3 in 129.10 seconds Completed Plot 1 in 355.32 seconds ( 5.92 minutes )
g:/chia/plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot.tmp -> g:/chia/plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot Completed writing plot in 9.43 seconds Final plot table pointers: Table 1: 1289152852 ( 0x000000004cd6e954 ) Table 2: 16128013546 ( 0x00000003c14df4ea ) Table 3: 30109584646 ( 0x0000000702abcd06 ) Table 4: 44196425371 ( 0x0000000a4a4fee9b ) Table 5: 58553204221 ( 0x0000000da20afdfd ) Table 6: 73640976346 ( 0x0000001125581fda ) Table 7: 91085406121 ( 0x00000015351cffa9 ) C 1 : 4096 ( 0x0000000000001000 ) C 2 : 1720676 ( 0x00000000001a4164 ) C 3 : 1720852 ( 0x00000000001a4214 )
Final plot table sizes: Table 1: 14151.44 MiB Table 2: 13333.87 MiB Table 3: 13434.26 MiB Table 4: 13691.69 MiB Table 5: 14388.82 MiB Table 6: 16636.30 MiB Table 7: 16882.10 MiB C 1 : 1.64 MiB C 2 : 0.00 MiB C 3 : 1227.79 MiB
Can you guys try creating a compressed level 1 -z 1
plot, please? You can then run the simulator against it or I think the validate
command ought to work fine as well, as long as you don't use -u
.
I am trying to determine if it's happening w/ compressed as well. Only common denominator I see so far is 256G of RAM
I am still unable to reproduce anything on my side, using the same published alpha3 executable. I used your plot id, @lokus77 and got the same output:
...
Compressing Table 1 and 2...
Step 1 completed step in 6.14 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 4.81 seconds.
Completed table 1 in 10.95 seconds with 3429245768 / 4294927287 entries ( 79.84% ).
Compressing tables 2 and 3...
Step 1 completed step in 4.26 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 4.73 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 4.75 seconds.
Completed table 2 in 13.74 seconds with 3439548453 / 4294801213 entries ( 80.09% ).
Compressing tables 3 and 4...
Step 1 completed step in 5.44 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 4.75 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 4.74 seconds.
Completed table 3 in 14.93 seconds with 3465446598 / 4294532457 entries ( 80.69% ).
Compressing tables 4 and 5...
Step 1 completed step in 4.71 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 4.79 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 4.78 seconds.
Completed table 4 in 14.28 seconds with 3531853268 / 4294092532 entries ( 82.25% ).
Compressing tables 5 and 6...
Step 1 completed step in 4.83 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 4.89 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 4.90 seconds.
Completed table 5 in 14.62 seconds with 3711682334 / 4293202019 entries ( 86.45% ).
Compressing tables 6 and 7...
Step 1 completed step in 5.58 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 5.20 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 5.49 seconds.
Completed table 6 in 16.27 seconds with 4291433858 / 4291433858 entries ( 100.00% ).
Serializing P7 entries
Completed serializing P7 entries in 2.03 seconds.
Completed Phase 3 in 86.85 seconds
Completed Plot 1 in 205.53 seconds ( 3.43 minutes )
D:/plot-k32-2023-03-13-18-40-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot.tmp -> D:/plot-k32-2023-03-13-18-40-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot
Completed writing plot in 5.74 seconds
Final plot table pointers:
Table 1: 1289152852 ( 0x000000004cd6e954 )
Table 2: 16128013546 ( 0x00000003c14df4ea )
Table 3: 30109584646 ( 0x0000000702abcd06 )
Table 4: 44196425371 ( 0x0000000a4a4fee9b )
Table 5: 58553204221 ( 0x0000000da20afdfd )
Table 6: 73640976346 ( 0x0000001125581fda )
Table 7: 91085406121 ( 0x00000015351cffa9 )
C 1 : 4096 ( 0x0000000000001000 )
C 2 : 1720676 ( 0x00000000001a4164 )
C 3 : 1720852 ( 0x00000000001a4214 )
Final plot table sizes:
Table 1: 14151.44 MiB
Table 2: 13333.87 MiB
Table 3: 13434.26 MiB
Table 4: 13691.69 MiB
Table 5: 14388.82 MiB
Table 6: 16636.30 MiB
Table 7: 16882.10 MiB
C 1 : 1.64 MiB
C 2 : 0.00 MiB
C 3 : 1227.79 MiB
But the validation looks good on mine:
[ 33] 228428..235347 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.70 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 49] 339173..346091 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.73 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 35] 242272..249191 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 1] 6924..13843 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.73 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 31] 214584..221503 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.71 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 26] 179974..186893 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.71 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 30] 207662..214581 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 14] 96910..103829 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.71 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 9] 62300..69219 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 29] 200740..207659 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.73 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 40] 276882..283801 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.70 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 23] 159208..166127 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 37] 256116..263035 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 52] 359936..366854 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 16] 110754..117673 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 50] 346094..353012 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 12] 83066..89985 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.72 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 20] 138442..145361 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.75 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 0] 2..6921 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.80 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 44] 304568..311486 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 10.77 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 59] 408383..415301 ( 0.03% ) C3 Park Validated in 11.03 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
[ 19] 131521..138439 ( 0.04% ) C3 Park Validated in 7.26 seconds | Proofs Failed: 0
...
Z1 plot
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe -v -c xxxxxxxx -f xxxxxxxx -z 1 -n 1 -t 8 cudaplot g:/chia
Bladebit Chia Plotter Version : 3.0.0-alpha3-dev Git Commit : eb6df030b555fb35addc3d6762424d52826a5d82 Compiled With: msvc 19.33.31630
[Global Plotting Config] Will create 1 plots. Thread count : 8 Warm start enabled : false NUMA disabled : false CPU affinity disabled : false Compression Level : 1 Benchmark mode : disabled
[Bladebit CUDA Plotter] Selected cuda device 0 : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 CUDA Compute Capability : 8.6 SM count : 68 Max blocks per SM : 16 Max threads per SM : 1536 Async Engine Count : 5 L2 cache size : 5.00 MB L2 persist cache max size : 3.75 MB Stack Size : 1.00 KB Memory: Total : 10.00 GB Free : 8.87 GB
Allocating buffers (this may take a few seconds)... Kernel RAM required : 90240524288 bytes ( 86060.07 MiB or 84.04 GiB ) Intermediate RAM required : 2999001088 bytes ( 2860.07 MiB or 2.79 GiB ) Host RAM required : 141733920768 bytes ( 135168.00 MiB or 132.00 GiB ) Total Host RAM required : 231974445056 bytes ( 221228.07 MiB or 216.04 GiB ) GPU RAM required : 6140243968 bytes ( 5855.79 MiB or 5.72 GiB ) Allocating buffers
Generating plot 1 / 1: caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b Plot temporary file: g:/chia/plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot.tmp
Generating F1 Finished F1 in 2.85 seconds. Table 2 completed in 10.79 seconds with 4294940352 entries. Table 3 completed in 12.30 seconds with 4294828493 entries. Table 4 completed in 34.84 seconds with 4294664198 entries. Table 5 completed in 33.87 seconds with 4294276894 entries. Table 6 completed in 29.84 seconds with 4293471970 entries. Table 7 completed in 24.96 seconds with 4292032633 entries. Finalizing Table 7 Finalized Table 7 in 12.93 seconds. Completed Phase 1 in 162.67 seconds Marked Table 6 in 7.24 seconds. Marked Table 5 in 7.01 seconds. Marked Table 4 in 6.81 seconds. Marked Table 3 in 6.46 seconds. Completed Phase 2 in 27.52 seconds Compressing Table 2 and 3... Step 1 completed step in 7.29 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 7.86 seconds. Completed table 2 in 15.15 seconds with 3439643097 / 4294828493 entries ( 80.09% ). Compressing tables 3 and 4... Step 1 completed step in 5.86 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.08 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.35 seconds. Completed table 3 in 20.30 seconds with 3465632385 / 4294664198 entries ( 80.70% ). Compressing tables 4 and 5... Step 1 completed step in 6.17 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.16 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.51 seconds. Completed table 4 in 20.84 seconds with 3532069601 / 4294276894 entries ( 82.25% ). Compressing tables 5 and 6... Step 1 completed step in 6.31 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 6.39 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 8.85 seconds. Completed table 5 in 21.56 seconds with 3711988308 / 4293471970 entries ( 86.46% ). Compressing tables 6 and 7... Step 1 completed step in 6.33 seconds. Step 2 completed step in 7.08 seconds. Step 3 completed step in 9.81 seconds. Completed table 6 in 23.22 seconds with 4292032633 / 4292032633 entries ( 100.00% ). Serializing P7 entries Completed serializing P7 entries in 2.98 seconds. Completed Phase 3 in 104.07 seconds Completed Plot 1 in 294.27 seconds ( 4.90 minutes )
g:/chia/plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot.tmp -> g:/chia/plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Completed writing plot in 4.94 seconds Final plot table pointers: Table 1: 0 ( 0x0000000000000000 ) Table 2: 1289333092 ( 0x000000004cd9a964 ) Table 3: 15289761796 ( 0x000000038f574004 ) Table 4: 29377360096 ( 0x00000006d706f0e0 ) Table 5: 43735021396 ( 0x0000000a2ecf7754 ) Table 6: 58824042271 ( 0x0000000db22fa71f ) Table 7: 76270911271 ( 0x00000011c219bf27 ) C 1 : 4096 ( 0x0000000000001000 ) C 2 : 1720916 ( 0x00000000001a4254 ) C 3 : 1721092 ( 0x00000000001a4304 )
Final plot table sizes: Table 1: 0.00 MiB Table 2: 13351.85 MiB Table 3: 13434.98 MiB Table 4: 13692.53 MiB Table 5: 14390.01 MiB Table 6: 16638.63 MiB Table 7: 16884.46 MiB C 1 : 1.64 MiB C 2 : 0.00 MiB C 3 : 1227.96 MiB
Validations:
I've tried to test it with:
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe -t 12 validate -m G:/chia/z1/plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Reading plot file into memory...
but i cant see in taskmanager any is reading the file in G disk. 8 of my 48 threads get 100% ussage but does not show more info, it stay in:
Validating plot G:/chia/z1/plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot K : 32 Unpacked : false Maximum C3 Parks: 429204
[ 0] Park range: 0..35767 Park count: 35767 [ 2] Park range: 71534..107301 Park count: 35767 [ 4] Park range: 143068..178835 Park count: 35767 [ 11] Park range: 393437..429204 Park count: 35767 [ 7] Park range: 250369..286136 Park count: 35767 [ 10] Park range: 357670..393437 Park count: 35767 [ 6] Park range: 214602..250369 Park count: 35767 [ 8] Park range: 286136..321903 Park count: 35767 [ 3] Park range: 107301..143068 Park count: 35767 [ 5] Park range: 178835..214602 Park count: 35767 [ 1] Park range: 35767..71534 Park count: 35767 [ 9] Park range: 321903..357670 Park count: 35767
does not show more text after +5 mins. Still testing.
With Chia plots check: The Z0 plot from log on top:
chia plots check -n 50 2023-03-14T00:38:59.097 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Loading plots in config.yaml using plot_manager loading code (parallel read: True)
2023-03-14T00:38:59.207 chia.plotting.cache : INFO Loaded 427834 bytes of cached data 2023-03-14T00:38:59.363 chia.plotting.cache : INFO Parsed 564 cache entries in 0.16s 2023-03-14T00:38:59.425 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: started, loaded 0 plots, 1 remaining 2023-03-14T00:38:59.425 chia.plotting.manager : WARNING Plot G:\chia\z0\plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-2023-03-14T00:38:59.425 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: batch_processed, loaded 1 plots, 0 remaining 2023-03-14T00:38:59.425 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: done, loaded 1 plots, 0 remaining 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Starting to test each plot with 50 challenges each 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Testing plot G:\chia\z0\plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot k=32 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Pool contract address: xch1fqq6pzznk0fcda6cnejayv9lXXXXXXXXXXX 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Farmer public key: 93b561e3666f2776d446fb4237fa5bXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 2023-03-14T00:39:00.441 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Local sk: <PrivateKey 5b7ab83e63db6c70f06fe06ee29XXXXXXXXXXXXXX> 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : ERROR Proofs 0 / 50, 0.0 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Summary 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Found 0 valid plots, total size 0.00000 TiB 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING 1 invalid plots found: 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING 1 bad plots: 2023-03-14T00:39:00.472 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING G:\chia\z0\plot-k32-2023-03-13-22-27-3d6a764cd3ba1be7fd28215e6db12e8850b43ea92af0d836dae94771a5a25e13.plot
The Z1 plot log. Normal error: Standard chia/harvester does not recognize compressed plots.
chia plots check -n 50 2023-03-14T00:45:03.051 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Loading plots in config.yaml using plot_manager loading code (parallel read: True)
2023-03-14T00:45:03.160 chia.plotting.cache : INFO Loaded 427834 bytes of cached data 2023-03-14T00:45:03.300 chia.plotting.cache : INFO Parsed 564 cache entries in 0.14s 2023-03-14T00:45:03.363 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: started, loaded 0 plots, 1 remaining 2023-03-14T00:45:03.379 chia.plotting.manager : ERROR Failed to open file G:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot. Invalid plot header magic Traceback (most recent call last): File "chia\plotting\manager.py", line 274, in process_file ValueError: Invalid plot header magic
2023-03-14T00:45:03.379 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: batch_processed, loaded 0 plots, 0 remaining 2023-03-14T00:45:03.379 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO event: done, loaded 0 plots, 0 remaining 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Summary 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : INFO Found 0 valid plots, total size 0.00000 TiB 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING 1 invalid plots found: 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING 1 unopenable plots: 2023-03-14T00:45:04.394 chia.plotting.check_plots : WARNING G:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot
Thank you for taking the time to get me this info. Does querying a few f7 result in challenges from a compressed plot?
Could you try validate --f7 <value> <path_to_compressed_plot>
where <value>
is a number between 0
and 1^32
. It's normal for it to return a message like "f7 not found". But if it has an error looking it up, it will exit with an error. You could try fetching a few (maybe around 0-20)?
I spent all day yesterday experimenting on windows to no avail. All plots continue to come out valid on my side, however I am on windows 11. I might try setting up a windows 10 machine. Downgrading to 256G of RAM also did not yield any issues, so it seems like it is not related to that.
As table entry count and pruned entry count appear to be exactly the same when I use one of your plot ids, it seems like the issue happens at the very end during phase 3, at the point of compressing to parks plot serialization. However, I've no findings yet. I apologize for the inconvenience.
like this? It shows "Could not find f7 xxxxxxxx in plot." instantly. 0 seconds.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 111111111 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 111111111 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 111111111 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 111111111 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 123132 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 123132 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 123 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 123 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 666 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 666 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 15627 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 15627 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 10000000004 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 625000000 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 12312355 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 12312355 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 12312356 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 12312356 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 110 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 110 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 38 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 38 in plot.
bladebit_cuda-windows-alpha3.exe validate --f7 38000 g:\chia\z1\plot-k32-c01-2023-03-14-00-20-caf327b4f5d96e452afae7749ef105c5035181bcff0d2275df04df60b63afa7b.plot Could not find f7 38000 in plot.
Like that yes. But could you try with a sequence from 0-20? It ought to at least have 1. If you get the same error from 0-20
, then this might indicate that the C tables are the ones that are corrupted.
Installed windows 11 and alpha 3 and was pleasantly surprised. Plots are valid. A great reason to switch to w11.
Well that's the second confirmation today we've got that plots under win11 work fine. I will have to indeed investigate on a win10 machine
Could not find f7 1 in plot. Could not find f7 2 in plot. Could not find f7 3 in plot. Could not find f7 4 in plot. Could not find f7 5 in plot. Could not find f7 6 in plot. Could not find f7 7 in plot. Could not find f7 8 in plot. Could not find f7 9 in plot. Could not find f7 10 in plot. Could not find f7 11 in plot. Could not find f7 12 in plot. Could not find f7 13 in plot. Could not find f7 14 in plot. Could not find f7 15 in plot. Could not find f7 16 in plot. Could not find f7 17 in plot. Could not find f7 18 in plot. Could not find f7 19 in plot. Could not find f7 20 in plot. Could not find f7 21 in plot. Could not find f7 22 in plot. Could not find f7 23 in plot. Could not find f7 24 in plot. Could not find f7 25 in plot.
I can do more test if you need.