CaptainSifff

If PLOS accepts, we need to get rid of our footnotes.... or make refs from them(Which we might consider anyway).

The description for education sounds more like it's for tutorials

duh... I will go for it anyway, now that I managed to upload all the contact details of the author. And it says *should* not exceed 2500 words.... Maybe they...

submitted!

Great find!

#276 has now qualified a bit of what we mean. Do you feel it is resolved?

One thing at least I'd like to rememember from today's discussion is that currently ~60% of the content of our paper is not mentioned in our title....

a new idea: Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a (Research Software) Engineer?

Making institutions for that available would be part of the next in this series. But good point!

Probably in the area between 3 and 3.1