CaptainSifff

This paper makes it a bit difficult to find reviewers who have not published with any of the main authors during the past years: https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/what-do-we-not-know-about-research-software-engineering together with the FAIR4RS paper....

OK, I've received the notification, that .pdf is not ok...

This is the command that I use for converting the .md file: `pandoc --standalone --bibliography=bibliography.bib --biblatex --filter pandoc-xnos --toc --number-sections -o comp.docx competencies.md` It gets the refs wrong and the...

files. [compmd.docx](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17342742/compmd.docx) [comptex.docx](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17342744/comptex.docx)

Thank you for your work!

Got a reply: No latex ....

that adobe converter is sick. Almost indistinguishable from the pdf. All the icons are there, AND all the tables! [competencies-adobe.docx](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17367765/competencies-adobe.docx) One wonders, why it has issues with some page breaks......

Now it's with F1000 again.

F1000 doesn't do appendices. Any suggestions how to integrate our appendices?

I went with the solution of @jngrad since it keeps more parts of the paper. And we still want the position paper to kind of cite the F1000 version. [157778-Compared1-HV-revision.docx](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17497269/157778-Compared1-HV-revision.docx)