Fabian Sauter
Fabian Sauter
Yes, good point! Have to remember myself to keep it simple :D
That's the current state. Is this simple enough, what do you think? 
Yes. I know what's going wrong and a fix will be published with the UI overhaul.
> > >  >  40d7a8b fixes it. Finally!
Yes, still up to date since for MUC OMEMO support a few other bugs and milestones like: * #50 * #55 have to be fixed/archived first.
Already created an Issue for it #126 . Thanks for the hint!
Sorry for the late response, but YES! UWPX now supports ([OMEMO 0.7.0 (2020-09-05)](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0384.html)) and I rewrote the complete OMEMO lib from the ground up. https://github.com/UWPX/UWPX-Client/releases/tag/v.0.31.0.0
Thanks for opening the issue. Will add it to the UI Overhaul (#50) todo list.
Yes, this looks broken. I will have a look at it. Thanks for reporting!
When UWPX hides all non `autojoin` MUCs, where should I keep them then? Do you have any suggestions for that? Since over time they should accumulate at the bottom of...