Ivan “CLOVIS” Canet
Ivan “CLOVIS” Canet
> @edrd-f > Kotlin’s focus on conciseness is clear. However, using listOf, setOf, and similar functions to declare basic collections like lists feels inconsistent in this aspect. Also, almost every...
> What is not an implementation detail but an observable behavior is whether kotlin.time.Instant can be passed to functions expecting a java.time.Instant (and vice versa) without any conversions. It's unclear...
Kotlin 2.2.0 is out 🎉
Your example doesn't generate the cases in the same way as the article I linked, but indeed this new version should make it possible. > Object expressions seem like the...
> Just to make sure I understand. After parameterizePairwise runs, for any given pair of parameters, each combination should've apprared exactly once, correct? I _think_ so, yes. To be honest,...
For more context about the real-world case, see [here](https://kotlinlang.slack.com/archives/C7A1U5PTM/p1762896894314829) and [here](https://kotlinlang.slack.com/archives/C7A1U5PTM/p1764189028283609) (both on KotlinLang Slack).
On my own project, I do see it work correctly on the JVM. However, I see the same behavior as the playground on JS, WasmJS, Wasm WASI and LinuxX64.
Oh wow. It is #2382. I just replaced the serializer in the real-world project by an `object` and it fixes the issue. Thankfully, in my case, it's fine to make...
Interesting! I'm in touch with them, they're actually the ones who introduced me to category theory years ago. I know they had many difficulties because Kotlin doesn't have type classes,...