CGAL
Spelling mistakes found checking en-GB to en-US
Based an #8514 a check words that are misspelling in en-US but are correct in en-GB (CGAL normally uses en-US)
Recognized by my spelling checker and by google translate as misspelled
- analyse ==> analyze
- analysed ==> analyzed
- analysing ==> analyzing
- behaviour ==> behavior
- behaviours ==> behaviors
- centre ==> center
- centred ==> centered
- centres ==> centers
- characterising ==> characterizing
- colour ==> color
- colouring ==> coloring
- colours ==> colors
- customisation ==> customization
- equalise ==> equalize
- favour ==> favor
- favourable ==> favorable
- favoured ==> favored
- flavours ==> flavors
- fulfils ==> fulfills
- Generalised ==> Generalized
- initialisation ==> initialization
- initialise ==> initialize
- initialised ==> initialized
- initialises ==> initializes
- initialising ==> initializing
- licence ==> license
- localisation ==> localization
- localise ==> localize
- maximise ==> maximize
- maximises ==> maximizes
- millimetres ==> millimeters
- modelled ==> modeled
- mould ==> mold
- Neighbour ==> Neighbor
- neighbouring ==> neighboring
- neighbours ==> neighbors
- normalisation ==> normalization
- Normalise ==> Normalize
- optimisation ==> optimization
- optimisations ==> optimizations
- optimise ==> optimize
- optimiser ==> optimizer
- optimising ==> optimizing
- parameterised ==> parameterized
- practise ==> practice
- prioritised ==> prioritized
- realise ==> realize
- recognised ==> recognized
- Recognising ==> Recognizing
- Regularised ==> Regularized
- specialisation ==> specialization
- specialisations ==> specializations
- specialised ==> specialized
- standardise ==> standardize
- utilisation ==> utilization
- Visualisation ==> Visualization
- visualised ==> visualized
Recognized by my spelling checker but not by google translate as misspelled
- Acknowledgement ==> Acknowledgment
- analogue ==> analog
- cancelled ==> canceled
- Cancelling ==> Canceling
- grey ==> gray
- greyed ==> grayed
- modeller ==> modeler Remark a bit strange as modelled ==> modeled is recognized
- Modellers ==> Modelers
- modelling ==> modeling
Questions:
- Should all those misspellings be corrected (except when in the bib file and the original document also has the "misspelling").
- should we have 1 PR per package
or
- 1 PR per unique misspelled word(-type)
0r
- ...
Note that we do not want to change if the word is part of a function name, because that would be hassle for users. I was for example wondering about gray, but we do it good here.
No variable, class, namespace, function names etc. I would leave out (and bib files have to be checked against the original title as defined by the author(s))
So if it is only documentation and comment, then I would say, make it just a single PR for the first category.
Concering mould it seems correct to me. See for example here. I guess the word is just too specific.
I'll have a look.
I think the cancelled / modeller should also be done as e.g. the word canceled is used (e.g. Linear_cell_complex/demo/Linear_cell_complex/MainWindow.cpp) so this would be more consistent (similar for modeller e.g. Arrangement_on_surface_2/doc/Arrangement_on_surface_2/Arrangement_on_surface_2.txt) the other words I didn't check yet.
- I've pushed a proposed patch, pull request #8519 for the general part
- I've just pushed a proposed patch, pull request #8522 for the "bib" part