code-coverage validation statistics (feature request)

[kwatsen]

Precondition:

• a YANG module (example.yang)
• a bunch of instance example documents (a.xml, b.json, etc.)
• a script that validates each instance example document against the YANG module
  • this script would run yanglint multiple times (distinct invocations)
  • presumably, there would be some special directory (e.g. ./.ycov/) that would be used to accumulate the statistics across runs (the user would be responsible for removing this directory before each fresh run).

Postcondition:

• a report providing code-coverage like validation statistics.
  • presumably, this report would be provided by a final invocation of yanglint that would just output the report (e.g., tree diagram)
• options (sorted by complexity: easiest to hardest):
  1. a single number representing percentage of nodes tested (e.g., 30% or 80%)
  2. a per top-level statement (data, rpc, notification, yang-data, etc.) percentage number
     • perhaps inlined notifications and action can be included here as well
  3. a tree-diagram like output that tags each node with the number of times it was tested
     • top-level nodes would have the highest numbers.
     • the value here would be in seeing which parts are not tested much, or at all
  4. some combination of all of the above

[rkrejci]

I like the feature, but I don't think that we have the capacity to do it anytime soon.

Few points for future implementation:

• do you insist on that special working directory? yanglint is able to process multiple input files, so I would prefer to do the stats during a single run of yanglint keeping all working data in memory and, mainly, being sure that the context is still the same.
• my idea is to implement this only in yanglint, not the libyang itself. The reason is that the usecase is quite rare, so I don't want to need some additional place for these stats directly in schema structures. Instead, some "database" of the visited nodes would be maintained inside yanglint

[kwatsen]

Hi Radek,

I don't insist on anything :innocent: and, certainly, that might be a reasonable first effort.

But if you look at https://github.com/netconf-wg/zero-touch/blob/master/refs/validate-all.sh, you'll see a typical validation test script (each one of my drafts has a similar one, and I'm soon to introduce a BCP that all I-Ds include a test script of sorts like this one. As a reviewer of other people's drafts, I want to be able to use test scripts provided by them, and I want those test scripts to, in part, output test-coverage statistics...

Anyway, you can see that the test script linked above is written in a test-case by test-case fashion and, for each, it sometimes needs to do hacky things such as:

• remove text that belongs in the draft, but not for yanglint (such as HTTP headers)
• convert RESTCONF examples into NETCONF examples
• convert "yang-data" statements into "container" statements

Perhaps all this could be done beforehand, and then everything fed into a single yanglint call, but I wouldn't be thrilled about needing to restructure my scripts to do that, or have to try to better understand yanglint error messages just to understand which of a number of tests failed...

Thank you for your consideration. Kent

[rkrejci]

ok, thanks for this input