Sinotov Aleksandr

Greetings! Sorry for such long answer. Too much shit in the world happens lately. > Could you add a testcase for this? You mean for this case? I tried to...

> I do not see how this could currently be done, sorry. How much of an issue is this for you? Hi, Not really :) I just start to use...

Any update on this?

> Nope, you are right. Oversight on my part. You currently have no (good) way to get metadata on the result set using an asynchronous cursor. I'll open an issue...

> parking_lot also avoids the poisoning behavior. You can get same behaviour by simple wrapper: ```rust struct Mutex(std::sync::Mutex); impl Mutex { pub fn lock(&self) -> std::sync::MutexGuard { self.0.lock().unwrap_or_else(PoisonError::into_inner) } }...

> The tone was intentional. They could have chosen any number of alternatives. They made the choice to break users. You still can use `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 cargo test` with same result.