Yannick Schinko

Bumping this again.

I was thinking about allowing any index with a syntax like that: ```yaml meta-formatting: prefix: format: - "highest[3]" - "highest[1]" ``` Now I'm not sure if this should be 0...

Regarding the default filter, I'd handle it like this: - If no filter is specified the default filter is used. - If a filter is specified the default filter is...

The point is that you *can* define *your* default filter. One that is empty by default.

I'm curious. What's wrong with the current schema?

I see. Might as well store UUIDs as binary for additional optimization. Saves space and performance from my experience (binary indexes are a lot smaller and faster than text based...

That would be even better. In principle at least. I’d check which performs better. Because at that point I think performance is better than normalization.

Issue still present on 0.14.0

Awesome. When could I expect that to be done? And excuse the question but is there a way to specify the flag when doing unit tests?

Ok. Will give that a shot. Thanks very much!