Bobby R. Bruce

@ivanaamit @Harshil2107 : Is there any good reason this has been forgotten about? From the looks of the comments we were close to having this done?

I think it's fine to add this feature but i don't think you should interfere with max_ticks current behavior. Remember we want to extent, not modify, when adding a new...

I'd love to quickly push these into our testing infrastructure but the big sticking point here is whether I can get KVM working on our runners. I simply don't know...

I played around today with KVM and the runners, I submitted a PR here: https://github.com/gem5/gem5/pull/470. It's all good news but perhaps not good enough. When the Github runners are created...

Getting GPUFS tests incorporated is contingent on getting KVM working in our GitHub Action runners as these are what runs our tests. I've outlined the issue of incorporating KVM into...

Thanks @nmosier ! I think your solution is correct.

> My solution to this would be to separate `obtain_resource` function to the resource class level. Can you explain to me why this is better than the current solution? >...

Implemented with #779

Closing this as it's been abandoned. An issue has been created to track the incorporation of the GPU DNNMark test into the testing infrastructure: #1421

#335 Takes a stab at this. Still WIP