BlueBrain
Semantic: check there is at most one DERIVATIVE block
This is not forbidden to have more, but due to a bug this fail in nrn.
Just to re-trigger CI testing for #1098
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
f57d0d7) 88.68% compared to head (ef4d3c3) 88.67%.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1099 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.68% 88.67% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 170 170
Lines 12548 12540 -8
==========================================
- Hits 11128 11120 -8
Misses 1420 1420
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
![codecov[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/254?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #172034 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
- :white_check_mark: spack_setup
- :white_check_mark: build:intel
- :white_check_mark: build:nvhpc
- :white_check_mark: test:intel
- :white_check_mark: test:nvhpc
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #172192 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
- :white_check_mark: spack_setup
- :white_check_mark: build:intel
- :white_check_mark: build:nvhpc
- :white_check_mark: test:intel
- :white_check_mark: test:nvhpc
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #172193 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!
Status and direct links:
- :white_check_mark: spack_setup
- :white_check_mark: build:intel
- :white_check_mark: build:nvhpc
- :white_check_mark: test:intel
- :white_check_mark: test:nvhpc
@pramodk this looks useful. It contains unrelated code which is now outdated. Should this be revived and merged? Alternatively we can close it as too old.
