Revise Conducting research section in Bitcoin Design Guide

[mouxdesign]

Describe your content request

Revising:

I would like to suggest revising the content of 2 pages in the guide (Conducting research + Getting to know your users). The revision will also include links to the UX research toolkit.

Move under research section heading:

Then to move the following under the conducting research heading

• Getting to know your users
• User personas
• Design research

The menu would ideally be:

Conducting research

• Getting to know your users (sub heading under conducting research)
• User personas (sub heading under conducting research)
• Design research renamed to "Research papers"

Conducting research would be a high level overview outlining:

• The importance of research
• User research is different with bitcoin (We have some copy about this in the toolkit which can be incorporated into the current copy)
• Kicking off a research sprint (Linking to Playbook UX Research toolkit)
• Working in public (Link to Build in public)
• Global audiences and use cases (Can link out to the Jobs to be done framework in the UX research toolkit)

Will add in more ideas for revising the "Getting to know your users" later on.

The goals of the shuffling and revision is to have one place that feels more like a "hub" for all things research related and putting them in one easy to find location + linking out as much as possible to the UX research toolkit.

[mouxdesign]

Idea from Ferreyo (Posting in the Bitcoin Design Community: Bitcoin Design Guide Channel)

_"Hey everyone - so I was reading the Conducting research section of the BDG and noticed two things that IMO could be improved:

The link to the Bitcoin UX Research Toolkit at the bottom, in the Resources section, is highly missable when I think it’s very valuable because it provides actionable items. This section (Conducting research) is focused on the differences for bitcoin and I quote: “To avoid repeating what has already been said about doing product R&D elsewhere, we’ll look at how it’s different on planet bitcoin.”Which I think it’s totally spot on but I feel like if someone is there looking for tools, they could miss the toolkit link at the bottom.

There’s is a section called Open source and open design which doesn’t add anything valuable related to Conducting research. Maybe we could remove this ?"_