Steve Loeppky

Immediate next steps: 1. (Expected date for PRs to be created: 2024-02-09): @biglep to get the "Reduce org owners" PRs created (and added to the summary table) 2. (Expected date...

> (Expected date for PRs to be created: 2024-02-09): @BigLep to get the "Reduce org owners" PRs created (and added to the summary table) I didn't get to this on...

FYI that I I'm not including ipfs-inactive since it currently doesn't have github-mgmt. Here is the current membership per https://github.com/orgs/ipfs-inactive/people: @lidel : not required, but I leave it up to...

"Reduce Org Owners" PRs have been created and are tracked in the issue description. The plan is to get those merged 2024-02-14.

@dhuseby: > > This set of ["org owners"] people should be: > > ... > > 3. representative of multiple independent companies/teams > > I like this a lot but...

Doh - I'm realizing I didn't have multiformats on the list of in-scope orgs. Doh! My bad! That wasn't intentional. I'm adding it now and getting started on the org...

Documenting some thoughts that occurred while [responding on what to do concerning some foundational-but-not-currently-active-in-github team members](https://github.com/ipfs/github-mgmt/pull/189#issuecomment-1942874694): I was wondering about going to a larger extreme of effectively removing all org...

I should have updated earlier on where things are at. I'm investigating how to tighten up the org owner role further. I'll report back more today. @galargh and I are...

> The current "almost secure but not quite" position is humane but logically untenable. Tighten it up as you suggest so everyone has to apply for the perms they need,...

**Phase 1 to reduce org owners is complete.** Thanks to all for the feedback here. We ended up reducing org ownership to just a couple of individuals, giving additional permissions...