Nguyen Nhu Viet
Nguyen Nhu Viet
> @Bidon15 are you able to help me set something like this up? Sure. Let's discuss how we can make it as the foundational work is mostly done in tg...
Actually, it's better to include the whole replace part ```go replace ( github.com/99designs/keyring => github.com/cosmos/keyring v1.1.7-0.20210622111912-ef00f8ac3d76 github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk => github.com/celestiaorg/cosmos-sdk v1.0.1-sdk-v0.44.2 github.com/gogo/protobuf => github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1 github.com/tendermint/tendermint => github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core v1.0.1-tm-v0.34.16 google.golang.org/grpc =>...
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/pull/414
> should we close this? We have groomed and decided to leave it open to post-mainnet phase
@Bidon15 1 bridge (4MB) and 1k light nodes das it
> @Bidon15 1 bridge (4MB) and 1k light nodes das it Updated the issue description to reflect this upcoming test-plan
Reproducible on upcoming upgrade of node/app ``` > --- CREATED ABCI REQUEST QUERY: data [2 20 78 133 242 6 252 181 69 213 98 121 171 202 161 47...
> Have we seen this recently @Bidon15 ? Only in testground tests so far Not in manual mode so far. Will keep posted if I can catch it
Grooming 01/11/2022 We can close this bc we have already defined what ExtHead is and ExtBlock does not and will not exist
Grooming 01/11/2022: @liamsi from node side, we have already got an ADR and implementation in the repo Still, docs side we have no info, so is it relevant to pass...