Bide Zhang

@jannahastings Thank you very much for your feedback. Sorry for the delayed response. We will try to address the first two issues mentioned above. We will mention it in the...

@wdduncan Thank you for the feedbacks. We are currently under discussion with our team regarding the issues that need to be addressed. We will leave a comment as soon as...

@jannahastings Sorry for the late reponse. To address the issues mentioned above: 1. Classification issues - We have moved the tests that were originally beneath 'diagnosis' to their corresponding positions...

@wdduncan To further address the issues raised in SCHO: - We have added the lisence for SCHO - We have changed the ontology IRI to http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/scho.owl, and version IRI to...

@wdduncan Thanks for the feedback. Here are some comments on the the points mentioned previously. > * The organism models should not be classified as ICEs, since they are material...

@wdduncan Thank you very much for your reply. I agree with your statement about the definition of 'in vivo model'. Considering the problems from the NCIT classes, we have now...

@wdduncan Thank you for the feedback. We have completely removed 'experimentation model' and moved 'in vivo model' under 'cellular organisms' and 'in vitro model' under 'material entity'. Furthermore, we have...

@matentzn @hoganwr Thank very much for your feedback. Regarding the version IRI: We would like to stick with the semver principle and keep the IRI due to internal reasons. We...

Thank you @matentzn for the feedback. - We have now firstly changed the ontology IRI and the version IRI to http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bpdo.owl and http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bpdo/releases/2022-06-17/bpdo.owl, respectively. - Besides, the broken URIs have...

@matentzn I just created a pull request for the update. Please have a look.