Biancaa Ramesh
Biancaa Ramesh
> [@Biancaa-R](https://github.com/Biancaa-R) Yes, sure. I've assigned it to you. However, it's better to start with one issue, I think. :) Thank you , but I ll try to finish them...
> [@dudals-jung](https://github.com/dudals-jung) thanks. It's the only an internal warning. But we will fix it Should we remove the references to embox.framework.embuild completely @anton-bondarev ?
@anton-bondarev It looks good ,but should'nt it also have tests for IEEE-754 specifies behavior for ±0.0 ? as Some libm implementations accidentally return -0.0 and POSIX requires hypot() to return...
> @Biancaa-R Thanks. I've approved it. Could you please prepare to merge (rebase under embox/master) ? Sure .
> Hi, could you explain what the idea here is and what exactly this is doing? To reduce the oreboot firmware binary size, I had tested a combination of Cargo...
> > > Hi, could you explain what the idea here is and what exactly this is doing? > > > > > > To reduce the oreboot firmware binary...
> > > > > Hi, could you explain what the idea here is and what exactly this is doing? > > > > > > > > > >...
> > > > > > > Hi, could you explain what the idea here is and what exactly this is doing? > > > > > > > >...
> Please stick with the main question: What exactly does the script look at, where does it touch any of the firmware? Where is the firmware involved? * The changes...
> > > Please stick with the main question: What exactly does the script look at, where does it touch any of the firmware? Where is the firmware involved? >...