Benjamin Piouffle
Benjamin Piouffle
This was requested again in https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective/issues/7282#issue-2130564845. @opencollective/design is there a simple change we could make to integrate this in the expense flow redesign?
My understanding is that the expected benefits are speed and disk space usage. @SudharakaP Are there any downsides or potential problems that we could face by moving to `pnpm`?
What about heroku?
@SudharakaP The [last comment](https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-nodejs/issues/688#issuecomment-1155104798) on the link you shared says: > PnPM now ships with Node. Anything shipping with Node should be supported by this buildpack. See [corepack](https://nodejs.org/api/corepack.html) for more...
> Basically why is there a difference in the way we handle the payment processor fee for expenses when paid by the PAYEE or COLLECTIVE? Shouldn't we record the payment...
Also created a followup issue to discuss the politics: https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective/issues/5219
> not including those events and projects in the filters I don't get the reason for such a limitation. Let's say that OSC wants to see how money flowed for...
@SudharakaP I think the underlying issue that hasn't been solved yet (unless I'm missing something) is that, as a host admin, when I pick "Babel" in the account filter, I...
- Explore full-screen (expense-flow like) for tax info.
Extracted the i18n part to https://github.com/opencollective/opencollective-frontend/pull/10194