Beth Griggs

/cc @BridgeAR @evanlucas @gibfahn (pinging the remaining releasers from https://github.com/nodejs/release#releasers-team)

> This is just a suggestion, but it looks reasonable to have in the rotation: > * A releaser for each one of the active lines (as usual) > *...

We should probably do something about this soon for J. Maybe we could create a list of proposed options, and then have a small poll? Poll participants TBD. But, I...

We reviewed all of the potential names suggested in this issue for "J" in the recent Release WG meeting (https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/758, 6 attendees) and the outcome was: > * Reviewed the...

https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/558 and https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/535 might be relevant/related to the discussion.

We discussed this in https://github.com/nodejs/Release/issues/735. I believe we're in agreement that we should create this guide, but it will be waiting on us having the time to write it. Removing...

Updated. I'd prefer to keep the schedule as is rather than move all the future dates out - I can make a call next week whether there's enough to warrant...

@targos I think doing one this week makes sense if someone has the availability to do so.

+1, assuming someone has availability to prepare the release

On the release mentoring call, none of the releasers had availability this week. ping @nodejs/releasers does anyone have the availability to prepare a release this week? (I am in the...