Benjamin Nickolls
Benjamin Nickolls
could we just add pending/draft status to `https://opencollective.com/user/transactions` ?
okay i still think the way to solve this is to add a section/filter/details to the `/user/transactions` page. What do you think @kewitz ? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ab7b/1ab7b791fa15c25a13254b79f403baf6eb1dd64f" alt="Frame 1"
For the purpose of support requests: note that the current provider (Privacy) calculates a budget based on a _rolling_ basis, not a monthly basis. So this would be a little...
do we need this at all given that Stripe cards check (live) the collective's balance before approving a transaction? This would only be relevant for Privacy but, given the issues...
on further conversation this is merely a reflection of the need to enforce a spending policy on some collectives, and for them to understand the practical implications of that policy...
> Should we take into consideration the rate of successful order creation? Absolutely 100% yes, this was the thing that costs us thousands of dollars last month.
## Kickoff ### Resources Review issue [https://github.com/Open-Source-Collective/osc/issues/3](http://url100.around.co/ls/click?upn=Ve2f-2FLodSFIkXBMESSfFGk-2Bql0WfTybH5x0RDDQbMzggsBwH06eq-2FQI6RBCp9goeqeKnNeHKkomZlqr9tyduIw-3D-3DBaQe_0pg8-2FkkoUjr3xH-2B4BEW7wgK7LT1hplaxrWkn41Lt64QkdKV3hpQ35jTMtqBfL0-2B2T3mrdh1W9k4e9oJvdgoX6lznvhZgWG2AhYcDUKz56Xv9TDpBPYka5hN9BCow-2BavxbSbhlYz7-2BaEWRSKfOyoZXo6cFuQOQydrIt-2FtXcHXqkL5NRF6K58mPvUkmujw-2B2aEpRpP-2F0gg-2FUWsSbYae55q45rfskEZlRrgLJevnxeWQbTEZrk3mgKDh2EUNFdI7aStpHUwO13shN8malympWn1PGxImXCeLGtnnq6GykRl6BqwlcBVbVXOJWOmMmPzH4Kg-2BNhegJmmiGrrcKB1-2BHxlCVSQDUnY4UJUepK9NcctkIpIUMMdqU6610OlDb45Vx2c) Update eligibility req (in github) [https://github.com/Open-Source-Collective/osc/pull/4](http://url100.around.co/ls/click?upn=Ve2f-2FLodSFIkXBMESSfFGk-2Bql0WfTybH5x0RDDQbMzggsBwH06eq-2FQI6RBCp9goe5e8yPzoSGSzwV0e4t0BZ5g-3D-3DJpra_0pg8-2FkkoUjr3xH-2B4BEW7wgK7LT1hplaxrWkn41Lt64QkdKV3hpQ35jTMtqBfL0-2B2T3mrdh1W9k4e9oJvdgoX6lznvhZgWG2AhYcDUKz56Xv9TDpBPYka5hN9BCow-2BavxbSbhlYz7-2BaEWRSKfOyoZXo6cFuQOQydrIt-2FtXcHXqkL5NRF6K58mPvUkmujw-2B2aEpRpP-2F0gg-2FUWsSbYae55q4xNAvkaOoMUpA6X8E6KGgV0WG-2BDaE8lyNWC8I0iMXXNzJnxxvBmSzWLHe5AFT0kQgN1m-2BwLj7etBhxQOoiCNUt-2Bl7ZXRIbfC4Mp7meFs3dlRkbjacpksV1cWkf-2Fx2X4HAvOrN2S8j43cS1uXL2WiVn2CQTHX8-2BQoRv0FSL48Sl-2Bh) Update eligibility in GitBook [https://app.gitbook.com/o/-LWSZizNMEjL8_DrMNdF/s/-MN_ynR0BjrarSoA9Z-A/~/changes/Z4Mvft9N2lqLtEBlxdvK/getting-started/acceptance-criteria](http://url100.around.co/ls/click?upn=Ve2f-2FLodSFIkXBMESSfFGjOaHp04V0Ft78lnUA8jXIlB-2BISnolmoFIG9mfuss463y9GfbkVbQc5vole5xER3Q8hGMTJ4LIZMatK8knWQHKkzPPeZ6tcibflZ7AK-2Boi2-2FKey7l6axnKj4D0TWKUpPS15bv6fJzuNHt-2FHyI-2BZOWG3vWiH8nHccaNDvt2FxBA9y8gOWnOLh2jOjnhfthF4H5A-3D-3DwRk0_0pg8-2FkkoUjr3xH-2B4BEW7wgK7LT1hplaxrWkn41Lt64QkdKV3hpQ35jTMtqBfL0-2B2T3mrdh1W9k4e9oJvdgoX6lznvhZgWG2AhYcDUKz56Xv9TDpBPYka5hN9BCow-2BavxbSbhlYz7-2BaEWRSKfOyoZXo6cFuQOQydrIt-2FtXcHXqkL5NRF6K58mPvUkmujw-2B2aEpRpP-2F0gg-2FUWsSbYae55q4909cKnCuPL4iwh2endw9by7gC5l0CaLAyJzexq7HrOHxqcIuOqySK1FEfKy31LQFyw734ARzGHFczj-2FYHuRS-2BcFCYssziS16OXO-2FXHO6lw-2BO5ApxvptvZTyMW8KuAeU5BPbrwUBR33PEA1vAP12L4w359veYx5y5BTg-2BvJkyVuK) Working process [https://gist.github.com/BenJam/3e8d9cd852850d14e61a0f1dcebcbe0b] Recording https://around.co/playback/4b961c4a-81c1-4966-b482-4daa88b4ebfd?s=myMeetingRecordings&sharedKey=c31f9629-56db-4d65-8b26-d89a10544358 ## Process We've two processes, GitHub and...
## Shaping Given the kickoff conversation above I think there are three parts that we'll need to dive into: - [ ] updating the GitHub flow to reflect the new...
Quick update after call with @znarf - discussed new eligibility criteria and technical approach, - discussed process of 'follow up' questions if we notice a licence isn't OSI approved or...
Provisional plan for this week - [ ] @aminakazi working on designs from weds - [ ] ? to look at engineering approach/make a start on engineering (@znarf to confirm)