Benjamin Encz

@kevinfez Currently there's no support for cancellation. Though in theory it shouldn't be too hard to implement. We already have a `completionHandler` that is passed in order to asynchronously update...

:+1: I realize that this issue is super old, but I would appreciate this feature :)

Thanks @luisobo. I think I'll look into this!

These are interesting ideas! Probably the first approach is preferable because it logically ends in a subscribe. I'm not entirely sure this change is worth a breaking API change? But...

This is the same talk, but looks like video is broken? :( On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 8:23 AM Malcolm Jarvis wrote: > I'm not certain, but > https://academy.realm.io/posts/benji-encz-unidirectional-data-flow-swift/...

@DivineDominion Realm sent me the video earlier this week! I just need to upload it :)

@Qata there are certainly some interesting ideas in here! Thanks for sharing. One big downside I'm seeing is that the middleware now needs to carry a generic type argument that...

@Qata I also renamed the issue so that the title is closer to your suggested changes :)

@Qata that makes sense. By removing the generic type argument we could indeed share Middleware between different projects. I agree that the API looks a lot more intuitive than what...

@Qata I understand that it's not typical for Swift to work with the `Any` type instead of a well defined one. However, it's important for a Redux-like library as this...