Vasilis Kalos

Discussed on WG call on 20th of Mar. No action to take rn. PK encoding related to #246. Will revisit after IETF for v03.

Discussed on WG call on 20th of Mar. Closing for now and will revisit when reviewing the latest academic works!

I like the simpler `encode_for_hash`. Keeping that the same, not sure why not call, ``` 1. header_prime = I2OSP(len(header), 8) || header 2. dom_array = (PK, L, Q_1, Q_2, H_1,...

Yea, this seems a good option to me! The "put all the octet strings at the end" sounds like a reasonable and simple rule (as long as we mention it...

Yea, sorry my bad, 2^64 is correct!

Discussed on WG call on 20th of Mar. Will revisit after we review and potentially use the updates from the latest academic works.

Discussed on the WG call on the 17th of July. Will review and discuss closing this next week.

Discussed on the WG call on the 28th of Aug. Draft using latest academic work. Closing.

Yeap! That's my understanding as well! Holder binding will be out of scope for the current core CFRG draft. That said, there is definitely interest in the WG to create...

FYI: posted a draft document on Holder binding in #262