Oskar Haarklou Veileborg

However, both `ClassFileSourceImpl` and `OptionsImpl` are public, so I guess you can do what the factory does yourself. ```java new ClassFileSourceImpl(OptionsImpl.getFactory().create(Map.of())); ``` Maybe the JavaDoc should just be changed instead?

This issue is still present today. :slightly_smiling_face:

I notice similar behaviour, except each trigger consumes >20 MB.

Yes, I can still reproduce this issue. The amount of memory consumed after each `cq` trigger depends on the contents of the clipboard, but the memory usage rises nonetheless.

Beware that my implementation actually uses `O(M + N log M)` space (where `M` is the difference between the smallest and largest elements), because it constructs a complete tree with...

> Does that :+1: mean that you are interested in this improvement? Indeed. I've opened https://github.com/kth-competitive-programming/kactl/issues/216 which is similar.

Like this? :slightly_smiling_face:

Yeah. `http.server` is a bad example for performance profiling, but it seems to work: ``` $ python3 -m vmprof --output file.prof -m http.server Serving HTTP on 0.0.0.0 port 8000 (http://0.0.0.0:8000/)...

I don't think this is a tool compatibility issue. Consider a pytest file like: ```python3 import pytest @pytest.mark.parametrize("param", ["one", "two", "three"]) def test_parameterized(param, snapshot): assert param == snapshot ``` If...

I had the same problem on Ubuntu 17.10 with the latest prebuilt release. Building from source fixed the issue.