Burak Yigit Kaya

@SimonGolms what does it entail? It's hard to speculate before seeing the patch but I can say for sure that our aim is to keep this repo focused on a...

@SimonGolms, still interested?

>Due to some incompatibilities, I could not refer to the ./sentry/Dockerfile and added a new one. How can we help to remove these incompatibilities?

>For me it doesn't feel like that the repo is in a mergeable state right now. But you and everyone else who is interested is welcome to take a look...

>Or you could create and use your own images for OpenShift with the appropriate user permissions based on their Docker images. @SimonGolms we have recently removed the need to locally...

What does this entail? Are there any references you can share regarding the needed changes? Also, would you be interested in working on this?

[>https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/runs/5339631065?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:1207](https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/runs/5339631065?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:1207) shows the issue

This is because https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/commit/53e38f42bcb01078a78169f4223894920e29276c - you should not have an interactive prompt when `CI=1` or [`--no-input`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/blob/b5bf8da514bef723e7e11940c869a9e203a1f86e/src/sentry/runner/commands/createuser.py#L56) is passed. 🤦🏻

Hence the "Status: Accepted" label :) Is this on @getsentry/single-tenant's roadmap or should I keep it on myself?

>I guess we don't have this in Asana, I'll figure out how to add this. I just moved this from Asana (was tracked on an OSS Team board) for the...