caffe
caffe copied to clipboard
Lower top1/top5 accuracy on ImageNet for reference model
Issue summary
I tried to reproduce the accuracy values (top1 and top5) for the reference ImageNet model (CaffeNet). However, I only get a top5 accuracy of ~67% which is lower than the reported 80% here.
Steps to reproduce
I used the model definition and weights from GitHub. I evaluated the model using this simple script. I used the pre-processing (transforming from RGB to BGR, image resizing, center cropping, and ImageNet mean subtraction) indicated in the ImageNet examples of Caffe.
I uploaded the predicted classes and the ground-truth labels as a python list here, in case someone wants to take a look at them,
Tried solutions
I redownloaded the network weights and verified the preprocessing.
System configuration
- Operating system: see below
- Compiler:
- CUDA version (if applicable):
- CUDNN version (if applicable):
- BLAS:
- Python version (if using pycaffe):
- MATLAB version (if using matcaffe):
I used the latest gpu docker container.
Issue checklist
- [x] read the guidelines and removed the first paragraph
- [x] written a short summary and detailed steps to reproduce
- [x] explained how solutions to related problems failed (tick if found none)
- [x] filled system configuration
- [x] attached relevant logs/config files (tick if not applicable)