BFO
BFO copied to clipboard
BFO repository including source code and latest documents
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on March 12, 2013 18:41:05_ Given the independent continuants A and B, I still think that one can axiomatically define that the following two expressions should have the...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on March 09, 2013 17:39:41_ See Janna's email: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bfo-devel/4iW_pVjfVIM/P7ZA_zBRXPcJ (perhaps Janna can provide original file) If groups plan to adopt BFO2, they should be prepared rather, than trying...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on March 09, 2013 17:19:49_ We have many property chains, for example: - has_part o part_of -> overlaps (note we need SWRL to properly define overlaps, but this...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on March 09, 2013 15:44:00_ For examples see the OWL, screenshots and README in: https://code.google.com/p/bfo/source/browse/trunk/src/ontology/owl-group/examples/spatial-disjointness Basic summary: RO only requires one axiom for effective checking of spatial disjointness...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/100840849128868144328/) on March 07, 2013 15:22:15_ 'has disposition at some time' and 'has disposition at all time' with same textual definition. Same for 'has function' and 'has role'. 'has...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on March 05, 2013 14:57:40_ The release notes say: " We use two patterns exemplified in the next two definitions: x rel-at-some-time y -> exists(t) exists_at(x,t) -> exists_at(y,t)...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on March 01, 2013 16:17:10_ Amanda Hicks, UAMS, [email protected] I have noticed that there are some unsound results for DL queries in BFO. In short, some of the...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on February 08, 2013 16:15:01_ The clause "if c migrates from bearer d to another bearer e than [sic!] a copy of b will be created in e"...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/112908894172563557652/) on February 05, 2013 20:26:55_ As we think about how to get started and proceed in creating BFO2-FOL, I wonder what purpose of this effort is and what...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on February 05, 2013 12:21:11_ Mentioned by Chris Mungall in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bfo-owl-devel/4iW_pVjfVIM/l2rZs6cUx6EJ and (I think) https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bfo-owl-devel/ToFi7JazGQc/ZTMFD5B-DzsJ The files pointed to are in: https://code.google.com/p/bfo/source/browse/trunk/src/ontology/owl-group/examples/ ReadmeProver.txt nuclei-cell-division.out nuclei-cell-division.prover9 It looks to...