BFO-2020 icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
BFO-2020 copied to clipboard

A repository for BFO 2020 artifacts specified in ISO 21838-2:2020

Results 49 BFO-2020 issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

I ran this scenario (alongside BFO-2020) through the reasoner that Werner and I use (natural-language summary below): t([0,occupies-spatial-region,material-entity-1,region-1,time-1]). t([0,instance-of,material-entity-1,material-entity,time-1]). ``` (cl:comment "at time-1 there's a part of region-1 that isn't...

bug

See commit 62640d3 The bug is in the macro that generates the dissective axioms. Occurs in 4 axioms across CL, repeated in P9, PDFs. Fixed in source - will close...

bug
FOL staged

In `bfo-2020-terms.xlsx` (BTW, pity not to see it in some non-proprietary format like CSV), on line 5 (exists_at): While _Elucidation_ speaks about "relation between a **particular** and ..", the _Domain_...

documentation

@alanruttenberg Following up on this [COB issue](https://github.com/OBOFoundry/COB/issues/40#issuecomment-1228553619). > The domain of the participates in relations are sdc, gdc, or ic but not spatial region. Together with the axioms that there...

enhancement

Fiat points, lines, and surfaces occupy zero-, one-, and two-dimensional spatial regions, respectively. I *think*, however, that the axioms don't imply as much. Am I right about this?

bug

BFO literature seems consistently to say: (A) Every material entity occupies a 3D spatial region. (B) Every site occupies a 3D spatial region. But there appears to be no axiom(s)...

FOL staged

Here are three axioms: (cl:comment "If a has-continuant-part b then if a is an instance of fiat-surface then b is an instance of continuant-fiat-boundary [ysp-1]" (forall (p q t) (if...

This concerns the spreadsheet and csv files for the terms, as well as the OWL files, within the folder [21838-2](https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO-2020/tree/master/21838-2). In the csv and Excel spreadsheet labeled “bfo-2020-terms,” there are...

bug

see https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO-2020/pull/67#issuecomment-1673525684

enhancement

Would allow a model ```code p1 i1 p2 |-------------| | p3 ``` if p1 and p2 (first and last instant) were not part of i1. Fixed by allowing possibility that...

bug