BUG: dc11:license

[johanwk]

In bfo-core.ttl, we find dc11:license along with dc:license.

dc11:license doesn't actually exist, so it would make sense to take it out.

(From the nit-picking department!)

[alanruttenberg]

I the file dc11 is a prefix given in the header. It expands to http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#license does exist. I'm not sure how prefixes get defined. In the temporalized version dc is defined rather than dc11. However it makes no difference. What matters is the IRI after expansion.

<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/"
     xml:base="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/"
     xmlns:dc11="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
     xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"
     xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
     xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#"
     xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">

[alanruttenberg]

If you are satisfied with this answer, that this is not a bug, please close the issue.