[REQ] Source type "context" is confusing to explain and understand

[cpuguy83]

What kind of request is this?

Improvement of existing experience

What is your request or suggestion?

We have a source type: "context". This has very little meaning to users, and is even more confusing because the default context name from docker is called "context".

So to use that we have a source that looks like this:

sources:
  foo:
    context:
      name: context

I think we should rename this source type. The only suggestion that comes to mind right now is client since that is where the content comes from.

Are you willing to submit PRs to contribute to this feature request?

• [ ] Yes, I am willing to implement it.