Provide example gatekeeper policies

[mkosieradzki]

trafficstars

It would be great for multi-tenant clusters to have example (and supported) gatekeeper policies that enable namespace-based ownership of the resources, e.g. you can only access resources from Resource Groups with names dervived from your namespace using some conventions.

This is an alternative approach to: #1173

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

[lwindolf]

I also consider this quite important to use the operator in a somewhat secure manner. Even with #1173 I might want to have gatekeeper rules just to uncover configuration mistakes.

[stale[bot]]

Issue still active.

[matthchr]

This is still something we're tracking to do

[matthchr]

We're still interested in doing this

[theunrepentantgeek]

We're still interested in this.

[matthchr]

We still are interested in doing this

[matthchr]

Still interested in doing this. We would also be willing to accept contributions from the community if they have sample policies that they're already using in production.