Adding files and folders from previous stable version
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
[!TIP] Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the
Getting helpsection at the bottom of this PR description.
PR review workflow diagram
Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.
Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!
- [ ] New resource provider.
- [x] New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been created in adherence to OpenAPI specs PR creation guidance).
- [ ] Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
- [ ] Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
- [ ] Other, please clarify:
- edit this with your clarification
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
- [x] I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
- [x] I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.
Additional information
Viewing API changes
For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.
Suppressing failures
If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the suppressions guide to get approval.
Getting help
- First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the
Purpose of this PRandDue diligence checklist. - To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the
Next Steps to Mergecomment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state. - For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
- For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
- If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in
queuedstate, please add a comment with contents/azp run. This should result in a new comment denoting aPR validation pipelinehas started and the checks should be updated after few minutes. - If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.
Next Steps to Merge
✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.
Swagger Validation Report
️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 201 Warnings warning [Detail]
Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
Only -1 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
| Rule | Message |
|---|
️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Only -1 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
| Rule | Message |
|---|
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌ModelValidation: 508 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Only -1 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
| Rule | Message |
|---|
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
- For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
⚠️Warning in generating from 4dba00828cbad8333212e0bb9ef6897ad11a6224. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-amd64/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-all/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Translations (main/i18n/Translation-en) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-amd64) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-all) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-amd64/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-all/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target Translations (main/i18n/Translation-en) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-amd64) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-all) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed. cmderr [automation_init.sh] npm notice cmderr [automation_init.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.7.0 -> 10.8.1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.8.1 cmderr [automation_init.sh] npm notice To update run: npm install -g [email protected] cmderr [automation_init.sh] npm notice command sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
️✔️azure-mgmt-sql [Preview SDK Changes]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 warning [Detail]
- For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
⚠️Warning in generating from 4dba00828cbad8333212e0bb9ef6897ad11a6224. SDK Automation 14.0.0command pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json command pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Get-ChildItem: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:787 cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line | cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] 787 | … rtifacts += Get-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s … cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] | Cannot find path cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] | '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because cmderr [Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] | it does not exist.
️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.Sql [Preview SDK Changes]info [Changelog]
️🔄 azure-sdk-for-java inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
- For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
️✔️Succeeded in generating from 4dba00828cbad8333212e0bb9ef6897ad11a6224. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json command generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/sql/armsql [Preview SDK Changes]
️🔄 azure-sdk-for-js inProgress [Detail]
️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
- For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
❌Code Generator Failed in generating from 4dba00828cbad8333212e0bb9ef6897ad11a6224. Schema Automation 14.0.0command .sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json cmderr [initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types-az' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types-az) registered for path 'bicep-types-az' cmderr [initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az'... cmderr [initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types) registered for path 'bicep-types-az/bicep-types' cmderr [initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az/bicep-types'... cmderr [initScript.sh] npm notice cmderr [initScript.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.7.0 -> 10.8.1 cmderr [initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.8.1 cmderr [initScript.sh] npm notice To update run: npm install -g [email protected] cmderr [initScript.sh] npm notice error Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/initScript.sh warn Warning: File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read. Please re-run the pipeline if the error is transitient error or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel. command .sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json cmderr [generateScript.sh] /mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500 cmderr [generateScript.sh] return new TSError(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes) cmderr [generateScript.sh] ^ cmderr [generateScript.sh] TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript: cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(6,20): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'colors' or its corresponding type declarations. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(10,19): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'yargs' or its corresponding type declarations. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(11,18): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'path' or its corresponding type declarations. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(13,35): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'fs' or its corresponding type declarations. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(14,23): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'strip-ansi' or its corresponding type declarations. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(42,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(53,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(69,67): error TS7006: Parameter 'x' implicitly has an 'any' type. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(70,49): error TS7006: Parameter 'f' implicitly has an 'any' type. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(94,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(105,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(106,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'. cmderr [generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(157,13): error TS2591: Cannot find name 'process'. Do you need to install type definitions for node? Try `npm i --save-dev @types/node` and then add 'node' to the types field in your tsconfig. cmderr [generateScript.sh] at createTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500:12) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at reportTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:504:19) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at getOutput (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:739:36) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Object.compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:955:32) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Module.m._compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1043:43) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1422:10) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Object.require.extensions.<computed> [as .ts] (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1046:12) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1203:32) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1019:12) cmderr [generateScript.sh] at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:128:12) error Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/generateScript.sh warn Warning: Package processing is skipped as the SDK generation fails. Please look into the above generation errors or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
️⚠️ azure-powershell warning [Detail]
- For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
⚠️Warning in generating from 4dba00828cbad8333212e0bb9ef6897ad11a6224. SDK Automation 14.0.0command sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json command pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
⚠️Az.sql.DefaultTag [Preview SDK Changes]
Generated ApiView
| Language | Package Name | ApiView Link |
|---|---|---|
| Go | sdk/resourcemanager/sql/armsql | https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/ddcdbf3100fb45bbaafb400a9a70d425?revisionId=08496582abc143a4a15808f8d410c04b |
| .Net | Azure.ResourceManager.Sql | https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/1e3ea1e2dc2c4679b3acd45b20b81a18?revisionId=09ab44dca0f447af83edce9dd9715304 |
| Swagger | Microsoft.Sql | https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/86f9467cec6a49f899d90b4872280851?revisionId=28ae8277e4f14c6485ce72d5c63b953e |
- Please add the template as per https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/29573#issue-2372227281
- Make the first commit with the exact copy of what you have today. In the subsequent commit, make changes as needed for this PR. This way, reviewers can compare what is changing in this PR. You can choose to abondon this PR and create a new one or update the commits on this. This PR has a single commit and 669 files changed. It is impossible to review this currently.
- Please fix the errors from Swagger LintDiff and Swagger ModelValidation if they are in the scope of this PR.
@ramoka178 it seems the PR description selection is broken. I tried in "edit"/"preview" and choose control plane link, but it cannot work with multiple retries. do we know how we could get the PR description? thanks~
- Please add the template as per Adding files and folders from previous stable version #29573 (comment)
- Make the first commit with the exact copy of what you have today. In the subsequent commit, make changes as needed for this PR. This way, reviewers can compare what is changing in this PR. You can choose to abondon this PR and create a new one or update the commits on this. This PR has a single commit and 669 files changed. It is impossible to review this currently.
- Please fix the errors from Swagger LintDiff and Swagger ModelValidation if they are in the scope of this PR.
- Please add the template as per Adding files and folders from previous stable version #29573 (comment)
- Make the first commit with the exact copy of what you have today. In the subsequent commit, make changes as needed for this PR. This way, reviewers can compare what is changing in this PR. You can choose to abondon this PR and create a new one or update the commits on this. This PR has a single commit and 669 files changed. It is impossible to review this currently.
- Please fix the errors from Swagger LintDiff and Swagger ModelValidation if they are in the scope of this PR. @ramoka178
- added the template.
- The first commit is just copy pasting the folders which were available in the last stable version 2021-11-01
- The LintDiff and swagger Model Validation errors are coming from feature teams present in SQL org, and we are infrastructure framework team responsible for releasing preview and stable version, having said that we wanted these validation flags so that we can push the feature team for the fix. we wanted the exception for these errors on this PR.
Can you all fix the PR description before we merge this?
Can you all fix the PR description before we merge this?
The current PR description is not correct, is it? This is a control Plane PR.
Can you all fix the PR description before we merge this?
The current PR description is not correct, is it? This is a control Plane PR.
Yes but the form is not filled in, right.
Can you all fix the PR description before we merge this?
The current PR description is not correct, is it? This is a control Plane PR.
Yes but the form is not filled in, right.
done now.
ModelValidation seems to be identifying some actual validation issues. Could you please review them and fix any you can? They might be identifying quality issues in your spec or examples. Like I'm not sure if the additionalProperties is declared correctly here, the validation seems to think it doesn't match the examples?
PS note there are more than 50 errors and you'll have to click through to see the other 400+.
[I.e. ignoring the errors is just allowing any quality issues to linger. If we aren't taking proper advantage of tools to help achieve quality, the tools are STILL incurring the costs (such as this PR analysis discussion) yet we're not getting the corresponding benefits!]
- Please add the template as per Adding files and folders from previous stable version #29573 (comment)
- Make the first commit with the exact copy of what you have today. In the subsequent commit, make changes as needed for this PR. This way, reviewers can compare what is changing in this PR. You can choose to abondon this PR and create a new one or update the commits on this. This PR has a single commit and 669 files changed. It is impossible to review this currently.
- Please fix the errors from Swagger LintDiff and Swagger ModelValidation if they are in the scope of this PR. @ramoka178
- added the template.
- The first commit is just copy pasting the folders which were available in the last stable version 2021-11-01
- The LintDiff and swagger Model Validation errors are coming from feature teams present in SQL org, and we are infrastructure framework team responsible for releasing preview and stable version, having said that we wanted these validation flags so that we can push the feature team for the fix. we wanted the exception for these errors on this PR.
How about you loop in folks from those feature teams as needed.
And any model errors that aren't fixable because they'd actually change your API, which I guess you don't want to be part of this particular PR, I'm sure we can agree not to fix when you call them out.
The feature team is working on these model Validation checks and that fix is not part of this PR. https://msdata.visualstudio.com/Database%20Systems/_workitems/edit/2984707